Maternity care in The Netherlands: The changing home birth rate

被引:27
|
作者
Wiegers, TA
van der Zee, J
Keirse, MJNC
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Primary Hlth Care, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 1998年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-536X.1998.00190.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
In 1965 two-thirds of all births in The Netherlands occurred at home. In the next 25 years, that situation became reversed with more than two-thirds of births occurring in hospital and fewer than one-third at home. Several factors have influenced that change, including the introduction of short-stay hospital birth, hospital facilities for independent midwives, increased referral rates from primary to secondary care, changes in the share of the different professionals involved in maternity care, medical technology and demographic changes. After a decline lip to 1978 and a period of relative stability between 1978 and 1988, the home birth rate started to decline further, to the extent that it might destabilize the Dutch maternity care system and the role of midwives in it. The Dutch maternity care system depends heavily on primary caregivers, midwives and general practitioners who are responsible for the care of women with low-risk pregnancies, and on obstetricians who provide care for high-risk pregnancies. Its preservation requires a high level of cooperation among the different caregivers, and a functional selection system to ensure that all women receive the type of care that is best suited to their needs. Preserving the home birth option in the Dutch maternity care system necessitates the maintenance of high training and postgraduate standards for midwives, the continued provision of maternity home care assistants, and giving women with uncomplicated pregnancies enough confidence in themselves and the system to feel safe in choosing a home birth.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 197
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Business of Birth: Malpractice and Maternity Care in the United States
    Bowman, Cynthia Grant
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 128 (03) : 987 - 989
  • [42] The Business of Birth: Malpractice and Maternity Care in the United States
    Getman, Rebekah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 63 (5-6) : 362 - 364
  • [43] The vital role of birth centers in modern maternity care
    Swift, Emma M.
    Halfdansdottir, Berglind
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2024, 42
  • [44] Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
    Stoll, Kathrin H.
    Hauck, Yvonne L.
    Hall, Wendy A.
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2016, 29 (01) : E33 - E38
  • [45] The Value of the Maternity Care Team in the Promotion of Physiologic Birth
    Zielinski, Ruth E.
    Brody, Mollie Gilbert
    Low, Lisa Kane
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2016, 45 (02): : 276 - 284
  • [46] Maternity care and birth preparedness in rural Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
    Wiegers, T. A.
    Boerma, W. G. W.
    de Haan, O.
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2010, 1 (04) : 189 - 194
  • [47] The business of birth: malpractice and maternity care in the United States
    Al Farizi, Sofia
    WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW, 2023, 32 (05) : 785 - 787
  • [48] The Business of Birth: Malpractice and Maternity Care in the United States
    Trotter, LaTonya
    SOCIAL FORCES, 2023, 101 (04)
  • [49] Innovations in home health care: Acute home care and the changing role of home care nurses
    Benton, N
    Brighton, T
    Crane, M
    Espe, E
    Jenkins, K
    Parkison, T
    Setka, D
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2003, 43 : 313 - 313
  • [50] Care transition of preterm infants: from maternity to home
    Rocha de Carvalho, Nalma Alexandra
    Santos, Jose Diego Marques
    Magalhaes Sales, Isabela Maria
    Cruz Araujo, Agostinho Antonio
    Sousa, Anderson da Silva
    Morais, Fernanda Ferreira
    da Rocha, Silvana Santiago
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 34