Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neurogenic Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

被引:1
|
作者
Awad, Ahmed J. [1 ,2 ]
Jex, Braden [3 ]
Kirchen, Gwynne [3 ]
Peterson, Stacy [3 ]
Endrizzi, Sarah A. [3 ]
Pahapill, Peter A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Neurosurg, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] An Najah Natl Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Nablus, Palestine
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] US Dept Vet Affairs, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
SCS; neurogenic claudication; neuromodulation; spinal stenosis; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; CHRONIC PAIN; NEUROSTIMULATION; MANAGEMENT; CONSENSUS; SURGERY; ANGINA; SYSTEM; COST;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: There is a debate on the long-term outcomes of surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) as compared to conservative treatment, with even more limited outcomes in repeat surgeries. Hence, other less invasive treatment modalities, such as neuromodulation with a modern spinal cord stimulator (SCS), could be considered in the spectrum of management options for symptoms of neurogenic claudication (NC) related to LSS as an alternative to surgery. Objective: Assessing the outcomes and efficacy of SCS in neurogenic claudication in patients with or without a prior lumbar surgery. Study Design: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively collected database. Setting: The research was conducted at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), an academic medical center, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Methods: This study reviewed all patients who had undergone SCS therapy for symptoms consistent with NC between 2013 through 2020. The data were collected from MCW. Only patients with at least one year of follow-up were included in outcome assessment. Results: One hundred and eighteen patients with primary symptoms of NC underwent an SCS trial with an 86% pass-rate. A total of 69 of the 93 patients who underwent permanent SCS implantation had at least one year of follow-up. All patients reported initial improvement after permanent implantation. At one-year follow-up, 55 (80%) patients had sustained improvement of their pain levels and claudication symptoms, of whom 52 (75%) continued to experience benefit for an average of at least 27 months. For patients with no prior surgical decompression, 86% continued to experience sustained benefit at the latest follow-up. Limitations: This study has several limitations. It is of a retrospective nature that includes selection and recall biases. It is a single-center study that limits its generalizability. More limitations are discussed in the main article. Conclusions: With modern SCS techniques, the majority of patients can achieve sustained improvement of symptoms of NC of at least a 2-year duration regardless of previous history of lumbar decompressive surgery. SCS can be considered as part of the conservative treatment options before committing to surgical decompression.
引用
收藏
页码:E1247 / E1253
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication
    Yukawa, Y
    Lenke, LG
    Tenhula, J
    Bridwell, KH
    Riew, KD
    Blanke, K
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (11): : 1954 - 1959
  • [22] RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS CONTRIBUTING TO LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - NEUROGENIC INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION
    MAGNAES, B
    HAUGE, T
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1978, 7 (04) : 215 - 218
  • [23] Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Costantini, Amedeo
    Buchser, Eric
    Van Buyten, Jean Pierre
    NEUROMODULATION, 2010, 13 (04): : 275 - 280
  • [24] Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication
    Hani G. Baramki
    Thomas Steffen
    Ronald Schondorf
    Max Aebi
    European Spine Journal, 1999, 8 : 411 - 416
  • [25] Prospective functional evaluation of the surgical treatment of neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Tenhula, J
    Lenke, LG
    Bridwell, KH
    Gupta, P
    Riew, D
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2000, 13 (04): : 276 - 282
  • [26] Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication
    Baramki, HG
    Steffen, T
    Schondorf, R
    Aebi, M
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 1999, 8 (05) : 411 - 416
  • [27] INFLUENCE OF TIBIAL TRANCUTANEOUS REPETITIVE ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION ON NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION AND F-WAVE IN LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    Kumon, Masashi
    Tani, Toshikazu
    Ikeuchi, Masahiko
    Kida, Kazunobu
    Takemasa, Ryuichi
    Nakajima, Noritsuna
    Kiyasu, Katsuhito
    Tadokoro, Nobuaki
    Taniguchi, Shinichirou
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (10) : 1046 - 1049
  • [28] Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis The Clinical Relationship Between the Local Pressure of the Intervertebral Foramen and the Clinical Findings in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Morishita, Yuichiro
    Hida, Shinichi
    Naito, Masatoshi
    Arimizu, Jun
    Takamori, Yoshihiro
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (02): : 130 - 134
  • [29] What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Ammendolia, Carlo
    Stuber, Kent
    Tomkins-Lane, Christy
    Schneider, Michael
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    Furlan, Andrea D.
    Kennedy, Carol A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (06) : 1282 - 1301
  • [30] What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Carlo Ammendolia
    Kent Stuber
    Christy Tomkins-Lane
    Michael Schneider
    Y. Raja Rampersaud
    Andrea D. Furlan
    Carol A. Kennedy
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1282 - 1301