A Bayesian approach and total variation priors in 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Kolehmainen, V [1 ]
Somersalo, E [1 ]
Vauhkonen, PJ [1 ]
Vauhkonen, M [1 ]
Kaipio, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kuopio, Dept Appl Phys, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
electrical impedance tomography; prior information; Bayesian methods; Markov chain Monte Carlo;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The reconstruction of resistivity distribution in electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a nonlinear ill-posed inverse problem which necessitates regularization. In this paper the regularized EIT problem is discussed from a Bayesian point of view. The basic idea in the Bayesian approach is to describe the resistivity distribution and voltage measurements as multivariate random variables. The regularization (prior information) is incorporated into the prior density. The solution for the inverse problem is obtained as a point estimate (typically mean or maximum) of the posterior density, which is the product of the prior density and the so-called likelihood density. A. class of methods that can be used to compute the posterior mean are the so-called Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. These seem to be especially suitable when the prior information contain inequality constraints and nonsmooth functionals. In this paper the Bayesian approach to three dimensional EIT is examined with an example in which the retrieval of a "blocky" three dimensional resistivity distribution is carried out by using MCMC methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1031
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation
    Wagenaar, Justin
    Adler, Andy
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2016, 37 (06) : 922 - 937
  • [42] Neural networks for classification of strokes in electrical impedance tomography on a 3D head model
    Candiani, Valentina
    Santacesaria, Matteo
    MATHEMATICS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 4 (04): : 1 - 22
  • [43] Imaging cell-drug response in 3D bioscaffolds by electrical impedance tomography
    Wu, Hancong
    Yang, Yunjie
    Bagnaninchi, Pierre O.
    Jia, Jiabin
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES (IST), 2017, : 373 - 377
  • [44] 2-D approach for reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography
    Semenov, SY
    Bulyshev, AE
    Souvorov, AE
    Svenson, RH
    Sizov, YE
    Kozlov, IM
    Posukh, VG
    Tatsis, GP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 18, PTS 1-5, 1997, 18 : 786 - 787
  • [45] U2-Net for 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography With Combined Electrodes
    Ye, Ming
    Zhou, Tong
    Li, Xiaocheng
    Yang, Lu
    Liu, Kai
    Yao, Jiafeng
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (05) : 4327 - 4335
  • [46] D-bar reconstructions with nonsmooth learned spatial priors in 2D electrical impedance tomography
    Alsaker, Melody
    Bladow, Benjamin
    Campbell, Scott E.
    Linthacum, Nicholas
    Mckenzie, Thomas M.
    Mueller, Jennifer L.
    Santos, Talles Batista Rattis
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2025, 463
  • [47] Cryosurgical monitoring using electrical impedance tomography - 2D and 3D feasibility studies
    Otten, DM
    Onik, GM
    Rubinsky, B
    THERMAL TREATMENT OF TISSUE: ENERGY DELIVERY AND ASSESSMENT II, 2003, 4954 : 114 - 118
  • [48] Dynamic optimized priors for D-bar reconstructions of human ventilation using electrical impedance tomography
    Alsaker, Melody
    Mueller, Jennifer L.
    Murthy, Rashmi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2019, 362 : 276 - 294
  • [49] Compensation of Contact Impedance Variation for Cerebral Electrical Impedance Tomography
    Shi, Yanyan
    Yang, Ke
    Wang, Meng
    Lou, Yajun
    Tian, Zhiwei
    Yang, Bin
    Fu, Feng
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (24) : 24541 - 24549
  • [50] Sampling of finite elements for sparse recovery in large scale 3D electrical impedance tomography
    Javaherian, Ashkan
    Soleimani, Manuchehr
    Moeller, Knut
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2015, 36 (01) : 43 - 66