Assessment of Decision Models for Hybrid Approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Hechte, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Wulff, Antje [1 ,2 ]
Marschollek, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Technol, Peter L Reichertz Inst Med Informat, Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Clinical Decision Support Systems; Decision Support Models; Machine Learning; SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-921-8-180
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A wide range of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have been developed. These CDSS are based on decision models, which normally have a knowledge- or data-driven approach. In this work a structured development of potential hybrid approaches was realized by the assessment of decision models and identification of their advantages and disadvantages. For the assessment of different decision models, eight criteria were identified and three of them were chosen as main criteria for CDSS: transparency, learning aptitude and handling of uncertain and vague knowledge. The comparison of decision models in regard to the developed main criteria resulted in an identification of three groups of models with similar characteristics. Based on these groups hybrid approaches had been developed, so that different decision models could be combined in a beneficial way. Thereby this work provides an instrument for a structured development of hybrid decision models.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 184
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An assessment of the current status of algorithmic approaches to the verification of hybrid systems
    Silva, BI
    Stursberg, O
    Krogh, BH
    Engell, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2001, : 2867 - 2874
  • [32] Approaches to Clinical Decision-Making in Assessment for Electronic Assistive Technology
    Taylor-Goh, Sylvia
    Mayagoitia, Ruth
    Kitchen, Sheila
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FROM ADAPTED EQUIPMENT TO INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 25 : 572 - 576
  • [33] A hybrid optimized approaches for ball bearing state prognosis for effective decision making
    Euldji, Riadh
    Boumahdi, Mouloud
    Bachene, Mourad
    Euldji, Rafik
    Colak, Ilhami
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2024,
  • [34] Approaches for applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in risk assessment
    Thompson, Chad M.
    Sonawane, Babasaheb
    Barton, Hugh A.
    DeWoskin, Robert S.
    Lipscomb, John C.
    Schlosser, Paul
    Chiu, Weihsueh A.
    Krishnan, Kannan
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2008, 11 (07): : 519 - 547
  • [35] Multifactor models of creativity: structural and dynamic approaches in psychological assessment
    Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V. G.
    Koltunov, E. I.
    Korobova, S. Yu.
    Glukhova, V. A.
    Naboichenko, E. S.
    OBRAZOVANIE I NAUKA-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2024, 26 (09): : 129 - 150
  • [36] Uncertainties in radioecological assessment models - Their nature and approaches to reduce them
    Kirchner, G.
    Steiner, M.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2008, 66 (11) : 1750 - 1753
  • [37] Assessment of open sea boundary condition approaches for coastal models
    Mayerle, R
    Palacio, C
    ADVANCES IN HYDRAULICS AND WATER ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 898 - 903
  • [38] A review of approaches to uncertainty assessment in energy system optimization models
    Yue, Xiufeng
    Pye, Steve
    DeCarolis, Joseph
    Li, Francis G. N.
    Rogan, Fionn
    Gallachoir, Brian O.
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2018, 21 : 204 - 217
  • [39] Probabilistic Hybrid Linguistic Approaches for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Decision Hesitancy and the Prioritization of Attribute Relationships
    Zhang, Junling
    Hong, Ying
    Qi, Xiaowen
    Liang, Changyong
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (02):
  • [40] Review of urban stormwater quality models: Deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches
    Obropta, Christopher C.
    Kardos, Josef S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2007, 43 (06): : 1508 - 1523