Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:17
|
作者
Zhu, Jisheng [1 ]
Tu, Shuju [1 ]
Yang, Zhengjiang [1 ]
Fu, Xiaowei [1 ]
Li, Yong [1 ]
Xiao, Weidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, 17 Yongwai Zhengjie, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Elderly patients; Choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Gallstone clearance rate; Meta-analysis; ULTRATHIN CHOLEDOCHOSCOPE; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SINGLE-STAGE; MANAGEMENT; STONES; SAFE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; GALLSTONES; OUTCOMES; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07394-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been becoming more and more popular in patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis. However, the safety and effectiveness of LCBDE in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis is still uncertain. This meta-analysis is aimed to appraise the safety and feasibility of LCBDE for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. Materials and methods Studies comparing elderly patients and younger patients who underwent LCBDE for common bile duct stone were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were stone clearance rate, overall complication rate, and mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were operative time, conversion rate, pulmonary complication, bile leakage, reoperation, residual stone rate, and recurrent stone rate. Results Nine studies, including two prospective studies and seven retrospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. There were 2004 patients in this meta-analysis, including 693 elderly patients and 1311 younger patients. There was no statistically significant difference between elderly patients and younger patients regarding stone clearance rate (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.42-1.26; p = 0.25), overall complication rate (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.94-1.82; p = 0.12), and mortality rate (OR 2.80; 95% CI 0.82-9.53; p = 0.10). Similarly, the operative time, conversion rate, bile leakage, reoperation, residual stone rate, and recurrent stone rate showed no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). While elderly patients showed high risk for pulmonary complication (OR 4.41; 95% CI 1.78-10.93; p = 0.001) compared with younger patients. Conclusion Although there is associated with higher pulmonary complication, LCBDE is still considered as a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis.
引用
收藏
页码:1522 / 1533
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bin Liu
    Liangyin Fu
    Tingting Lu
    Guangming Zhang
    Xiaohua Dong
    Qiqi Zhao
    Miao Yu
    Haizhong Ma
    Kehu Yang
    Hui Cai
    World Journal of Surgery, 2023, 47 : 1809 - 1820
  • [42] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
    Jisheng Zhu
    Guoyong Li
    Peng Du
    Xin Zhou
    Weidong Xiao
    Yong Li
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 997 - 1005
  • [43] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
    Zhu, Jisheng
    Li, Guoyong
    Du, Peng
    Zhou, Xin
    Xiao, Weidong
    Li, Yong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (03): : 997 - 1005
  • [44] Outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration by Chopstick Technique in Choledocholithiasis
    Suwatthanarak, Tharathorn
    Akaraviputh, Thawatchai
    Phalanusitthepha, Chainarong
    Chinswangwatanakul, Vitoon
    Methasate, Asada
    Swangsri, Jirawat
    Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn
    Parakonthun, Thammawat
    Taweerutchana, Voraboot
    Srisuworanan, Nicha
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2021, 25 (02)
  • [45] Choledocholithiasis, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration
    Kroh, Matthew
    Chand, Bipan
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 88 (05) : 1019 - +
  • [46] What is the best approach for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: Transcystic or Trans-ductal? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Sarma, Diwakar
    Mankotia, Rajnish
    Kumar, Yogesh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 29 - 30
  • [47] Status and technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in cases of choledocholithiasis
    Czarnetzki, HD
    Schulz, S
    Jantschulev, M
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1998, 123 : 46 - 49
  • [48] Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis: Analysis of Practice Patterns of Intermountain HealthCare
    Gilsdorf, Daniel
    Henrichsen, Jake
    Liljestrand, Katie
    Staheli, Allison
    Olsen, Griffin
    Narayanan, Prem
    Ott, Mark
    Morris, David S.
    Price, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (06) : 1160 - 1165
  • [49] THE UTILITY OF LAPAROSCOPIC COMMON BILE-DUCT EXPLORATION IN THE TREATMENT OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
    FERZLI, GS
    MASSAAD, A
    KIEL, T
    WORTH, MH
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (04): : 296 - 298
  • [50] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; a preferential pathway for elderly patients
    Platt, T. E.
    Smith, K.
    Sinha, S.
    Nixon, M.
    Srinivas, G.
    Johnson, N.
    Andrews, S.
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2018, 30 : 13 - 17