Items from Psychometric Tests as Training Data for Personality Profiling Models of Twitter Users

被引:0
|
作者
Kreuter, Anne [1 ]
Sassenberg, Kai [2 ,3 ]
Klinger, Roman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Wissensmedien, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Machine-learned models for author profiling in social media often rely on data acquired via self-reporting-based psychometric tests (questionnaires) filled out by social media users. This is an expensive but accurate data collection strategy. Another, less costly alternative, which leads to potentially more noisy and biased data, is to rely on labels inferred from publicly available information in the profiles of the users, for instance self-reported diagnoses or test results. In this paper, we explore a third strategy, namely to directly use a corpus of items from validated psychometric tests as training data. Items from psychometric tests often consist of sentences from an I-perspective (e.g., "I make friends easily."). Such corpora of test items constitute 'small data', but their availability for many concepts is a rich resource. We investigate this approach for personality profiling, and evaluate BERT classifiers fine-tuned on such psychometric test items for the big five personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) and analyze various augmentation strategies regarding their potential to address the challenges coming with such a small corpus. Our evaluation on a publicly available Twitter corpus shows a comparable performance to in-domain training for 4/5 personality traits with T5-based data augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 323
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WHAT IS THE DATA WE COLLECT FROM OUR PSYCHOMETRIC SCREENING TESTS TELLING US?
    Taverner, Murray
    Monagle, John
    Stone, Jeremy
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 47 (S1): : 90 - 91
  • [22] Tests of rain profiling algorithms for a spaceborne radar using raincell models and real data precipitation fields
    Testud, Jacques
    Amayenc, Paul
    Dou, Xiankang
    Tani, Taoufik
    1996, (13):
  • [23] Tests of rain profiling algorithms for a spaceborne radar using raincell models and real data precipitation fields
    Testud, J
    Amayenc, P
    Dou, XK
    Tani, TF
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 13 (02) : 426 - 453
  • [24] Mining Data Impressions From Deep Models as Substitute for the Unavailable Training Data
    Nayak, Gaurav Kumar
    Mopuri, Konda Reddy
    Jain, Saksham
    Chakraborty, Anirban
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 44 (11) : 8465 - 8481
  • [25] Infinite Dropout for training Bayesian models from data streams
    Van-Son Nguyen
    Duc-Tung Nguyen
    Linh Ngo Van
    Khoat Than
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2019, : 125 - 134
  • [26] TRAINING KSIM MODELS FROM TIME-SERIES DATA
    BLACK, RL
    OLDHAM, WJB
    MARCY, WM
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1994, 47 (03) : 293 - 307
  • [27] Validation of calculation models for measurement uncertainty by data from proficiency tests
    Frenz, H.
    Wieler, S.
    Weißmüller, C.
    VDI Berichte, 2006, (1947): : 171 - 180
  • [28] Linearization of ultrafiltration models: analysis of experimental data from ultrafiltration tests
    Vincent-Vela, Maria-Cinta
    Alvarez-Blanco, Silvia
    Lora-Garcia, Jaime
    Bergantinos-Rodriguez, Enrique
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2009, 10 (1-3) : 144 - 147
  • [29] Unbiased Quantitative Models of Protein Translation Derived from Ribosome Profiling Data
    Gritsenko, Alexey A.
    Hulsman, Marc
    Reinders, Marcel J. T.
    de Ridder, Dick
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 11 (08)
  • [30] Psychometric and electrodermal activity data from an experimental paradigm of memory encoding with some items periodically followed by painful electric shock
    Citro, Ally T.
    Norton, Caroline M.
    Pcola, Samantha J.
    Vogt, Keith M.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 31