Using multi-criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems

被引:45
|
作者
Talukder, Byomkesh [1 ]
Hipel, Keith W. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
vanLoon, Gary W. [5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, MCCHE, Montreal, PQ H3A 1X9, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Ctr Int Governance Innovat, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Balsillie Sch Int Affairs, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Sch Environm Studies, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
aggregation of indicators; agricultural sustainability; assessment; indicators; multi-criteria decision analysis; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; FOOD SECURITY; WEB-HIPRE; SUPPORT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/sd.1848
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Composite indicators for six key categories of agricultural sustainability are utilized within a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) structure to assess and compare the sustainability of different agricultural systems. Individual indicators - productivity, stability, efficiency, durability, compatibility and equity - were used to develop composite indicators. In this research, the major steps used to obtain the aggregated indicators and assess sustainability are: define sustainability; recognize sustainability issues; identify indicators; categorize sustainability; measure indicator values to develop composite indicators; give weighting to the categories of sustainability; aggregate composite indicators; and compare the sustainability of different agricultural systems. Using composite indicators, an MCDA structure is employed to evaluate and rank the agricultural systems of southwest coastal Bangladesh in terms of the level of agricultural sustainability of each one. The case study demonstrates that this MCDA approach has the potential to become a useful framework for agricultural sustainability assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 799
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems: The validity of expert opinion and robustness of a multi-criteria analysis
    Kamali, Farahnaz Pashaei
    Borges, Joao A. R.
    Meuwissen, Miranda P. M.
    de Boer, Imke J. M.
    Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 157 : 118 - 128
  • [12] Assessing sustainability and risks: About using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology within an organization
    Merad, M.
    Dechy, N.
    Marcel, F.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 2309 - 2316
  • [13] SCORE: A novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation
    Rosen, Lars
    Back, Par-Erik
    Soderqvist, Tore
    Norrman, Jenny
    Brinkhoff, Petra
    Norberg, Tommy
    Volchko, Yevheniya
    Norin, Malin
    Bergknut, Magnus
    Doberl, Gernot
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 511 : 621 - 638
  • [14] A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods for Sustainability Assessment of District Heating Systems
    Daugavietis, Janis Edmunds
    Soloha, Raimonda
    Dace, Elina
    Ziemele, Jelena
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [15] Multi-Criteria Decision Making in the sustainability assessment of sewerage pipe systems
    de la Fuente, Albert
    Pons, Oriol
    Josa, Alejandro
    Aguado, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4762 - 4770
  • [16] The Value of Assessing Weights in Multi-criteria Portfolio Decision Analysis
    Keisler, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2008, 15 (5-6) : 111 - 123
  • [17] Rural sustainability assessment using a combination of multi-criteria decision making and factor analysis
    Aliloo, Ali Asghar
    Dashti, Sharhryar
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (04) : 6323 - 6336
  • [18] Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis
    Maxim, Alexandru
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 : 284 - 297
  • [19] Sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals: A Delphi study using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Van Schoubroeck, Sophie
    Springael, Johan
    Van Dael, Miet
    Malina, Robert
    Van Passel, Steven
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 144 : 198 - 208
  • [20] Using Key Performance Indicators and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Compare the Sustainability of Mobility
    Koelpin, Sven
    Stamer, Daniel
    vom Berg, Benjamin Wagner
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ITEE2013), 2014, : 93 - 104