Audit quality and fees: Evidence from Spain

被引:4
|
作者
Guzman-Raja, Isidoro [1 ]
Gonzalez-Sanchez, Mariano [2 ]
Rua-Alonso-De-Corrales, Enrique [3 ]
Sanchez-Garcia, Juan Francisco [4 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Cartagena Spain, Fac Business Sci, Dept Econ Accounting & Finance, C Real 3, Cartagena 30201, Spain
[2] UNED Spain, Sch Econ, Dept Business & Accounting, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ CEU San Pablo Madrid Spain, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Business Econ, Madrid, Spain
[4] Tech Univ Cartagena Spain, Fac Business Sci, Dept Quantitat Methods Legal Sci & Modern Languag, Cartagena, Spain
关键词
Audit fees; auditor size; auditor's opinion; audit quality; GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS; NONAUDIT FEES; INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; IFRS ADOPTION; SERVICES; IMPACT; FIRM; INDEPENDENCE; TENURE; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1080/02102412.2021.1919959
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This empirical research uses panel data methodology to find the main factors determining Spanish audit quality. on a sample with more than 60,000 audited companies from 2013 to 2018. Prior to analysing the quality of the audit, we have adjusted the best possible model to the audit fees behaviour in order to extract the abnormal fees. Our dynamic model shows that audited company's size, the previous year's audit fees, the years with the same audit firm, the auditor's opinion, the auditor rotation, the concentration or dedication to the client and the client sector are explanatory factors of audit fees. Further, we find evidence that audit quality improves with number of hours billed for audit work and decreases with sector concentration of auditor and, a novel multiplicative effect, the auditor size by abnormal audit fees, in such a way that the surcharge (abnormal fees) of the big audit firms contribute negatively to improve the audit quality.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 492
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of audit characteristics, audit fees on classification shifting: evidence from Germany
    Usman, Muhammad
    Ezeani, Ernest
    Salem, Rami Ibrahim A.
    Song, Xi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (03) : 408 - 426
  • [42] Compulsory Audit Tendering and Audit Fees: Evidence from Australian Local Government
    Boon, Kym
    Crowe, Susan
    McKinnon, Jill
    Ross, Philip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2005, 9 (03) : 221 - 241
  • [43] Audit effort, materiality and audit fees: evidence from the adoption of IFRS in Australia
    Miah, Muhammad Shahin
    Jiang, Haiyan
    Rahman, Asheq
    Stent, Warwick
    ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 33 (01) : 186 - 216
  • [44] Audit committee-auditor interlocking and audit fees: evidence from China
    Xiang, Rui
    Lin, Rongyu
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (57) : 7669 - 7685
  • [45] Family Firms, Audit Committees and Audit Fees: Evidence from an Emerging Economy
    Haji-Abdullah, Noor Marini
    Othman, Rohana
    Shrestha, Keshab
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2016, 22 (12) : 4465 - 4468
  • [46] The Overseas Experience of Audit Committee and Audit Fees: Empirical Evidence from China
    Li, Chengai
    Pan, Lin
    Chen, Meilan
    COMPLEXITY, 2021, 2021 (2021)
  • [47] Discussion of "Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden"
    Bedard, Jean C.
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 29 (01) : 341 - 348
  • [48] Costs of Mandatory Periodic Audit Partner Rotation: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Timeliness
    Sharma, Divesh S.
    Tanyi, Paul N.
    Litt, Barri A.
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2017, 36 (01): : 129 - 149
  • [49] The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the Audit Process: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Delay
    Bailey, Cristina
    Collins, Denton L.
    Abbott, Lawrence J.
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2018, 37 (03): : 25 - 46
  • [50] Audit Quality, Audit Fees and the CPA Organizational Forms
    Hu Nan-wei
    Zhang Jiang-na
    Zhou Yi-fan
    2016 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2016,