Recruitment of young women to a trial of chlamydia screening - as easy as it sounds?

被引:10
|
作者
Atherton, Helen [1 ]
Banks, Debbie [1 ]
Harbit, Ruth [1 ]
Long, Linzie [1 ]
Chadd, Fiona [1 ]
Hay, Phillip [2 ]
Kerry, Sally [1 ]
Simms, Ian [3 ]
Oakeshott, Pippa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Div Commun Hlth Sci, London, England
[2] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Dept Genitourinary Med, London, England
[3] Ctr Infect, Hlth Protect Agcy, London, England
来源
TRIALS | 2007年 / 8卷
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PARTICIPATION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-8-41
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Recruiting to trials is complex and difficult. The Prevention of Pelvic Infection (POPI) trial aims to see if screening women for chlamydia and treating those found to be infected reduces the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease in the following twelve months. It focuses on young, sexually active, multiethnic, mainly inner city, female students. The main aim of this paper is to describe our recruitment methods. Secondary aims in two small subgroups, are to compare characteristics of women recruited with those not recruited, and to explore participants' understanding of when their samples would be tested for chlamydia. Methods: Women students attending lectures or in common rooms at 22 universities and further education colleges were recruited by female research assistants working in pairs. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire on sexual health and to provide self-taken vaginal swabs. In addition, during 3 recruitment sessions, a female medical student asked non-participants to complete a brief anonymous questionnaire on reasons for not taking part. Finally another female medical student contacted 40 consecutive participants within a month of recruitment and asked if they understood that their samples might not be tested for a year. Results: With enormous effort over 2 years we recruited 2526 women. A survey of 61 non-responders showed only 18 (30%) were eligible to take part (age < 28, been sexually active and not been tested for chlamydia in the past 3 months). Eligible non-responders were of similar age to the 35 responders in the same recruitment sessions, but more likely to be from ethnic minority groups (67% 12/18 versus 29% 10/35 p < 0.01). Email and telephone contact with 35/40 (88%) of consecutive participants showed only two (6%) did not understand that their specimen might not be tested for chlamydia for a year. Thirty participants (85%) could name one or more possible consequences of untreated chlamydia infection. Conclusion: As in other studies, a key to attaining recruitment targets was the enthusiasm of the research team. Minority ethnic groups were probably under-represented, but understanding of participants was good.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Young women's perspective of the pros and cons to seeking screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea:: An exploratory study
    Chacko, Mariam R.
    von Sternberg, Kirk
    Velasquez, Mary M.
    Wiemann, Constance M.
    Smith, Peggy B.
    DiClemente, Ralph
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 21 (04) : 187 - 193
  • [42] New sexual partners and readiness to seek screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: Predictors among young women
    Chacko, M
    Wiemann, C
    Kozinetz, C
    DiClemente, R
    Smith, P
    Velasquez, M
    von Sternberg, K
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2005, 36 (02) : 133 - 133
  • [43] A randomized trial of screening for intimate partner violence in young women.
    Davidson, L. L.
    Palmetto, N. P.
    Jones, K. E.
    Rickert, V. I.
    Breitbart, V.
    Tanenhaus, J.
    Aljuwani, T.
    Forbes, M.
    Zeitler, M.
    Stevens, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (11) : S258 - S258
  • [44] Should Chlamydia screening be offered to women with miscarriages?
    Juhl, Caroline
    Christensen, Martin
    Bor, Pinar
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 : 95 - 96
  • [45] Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women Reply
    Wiesenfeld, Harold C.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (22): : 2198 - 2198
  • [46] Rectal chlamydia - should screening be recommended in women?
    Andersson, Nirina
    Boman, Jens
    Nylander, Elisabet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2017, 28 (05) : 476 - 479
  • [47] How best to engage young men in Chlamydia screening?
    Dabrera, Gavin
    Pinson, David
    Whiteman, Steve
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2012, 9 (01) : 58 - 59
  • [48] Screening for chlamydia trachomatis: Barriers for homeless young people
    Henning, Dorothy
    Ryan, Alice
    Sanci, Lena
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 24 (03) : 8 - 13
  • [49] Can we use postal surveys with anonymous testing to monitor chlamydia prevalence in young women in England? Pilot study incorporating randomised controlled trial of recruitment methods
    Woodhall, Sarah C.
    Nichols, Tom
    Alexander, Sarah
    da Silva, Filomeno Coelho
    Mercer, Catherine H.
    Ison, Catherine
    Gill, O. Noel
    Soldan, Kate
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2015, 91 (06) : 412 - 414
  • [50] Early screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young women for primary prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease (i-Predict): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Jeanne Tamarelle
    Anne C. M. Thiébaut
    Bénédicte Sabin
    Cécile Bébéar
    Philippe Judlin
    Arnaud Fauconnier
    Delphine Rahib
    Layidé Méaude-Roufai
    Jacques Ravel
    Servaas A. Morré
    Bertille de Barbeyrac
    Elisabeth Delarocque-Astagneau
    Trials, 18