Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Treating Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind and Sham-Controlled Trials

被引:57
|
作者
Berlim, Marcelo T. [1 ,2 ]
Van den Eynde, Frederique [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Douglas Mental Hlth Univ Inst, Neuromodulat Res Clin, Montreal, PQ H4H 1R3, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE | 2014年 / 59卷 / 09期
关键词
posttraumatic stress disorder; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; efficacy; acceptability; COGNITIVE ABNORMALITIES; MAJOR DEPRESSION; RTMS; COMORBIDITY; ANXIETY; MEMORY; PREVALENCE; INVENTORY; MEDICINE; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1177/070674371405900905
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has yielded promising results as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, to date, no quantitative review of its clinical utility has been published. Method: We searched for randomized and sham-controlled trials from 1995 to March 2013 using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS. We then performed an exploratory random effects meta-analysis. Results: Studies on rTMS applied to the right DLPFC included 64 adults with PTSD. The pooled Hedges g effect size for pre and post changes in clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD symptoms were, respectively, 1.65 (P < 0.001) and 1.91 (P < 0.001), indicating significant and large-sized differences in outcome favouring active rTMS. Also, there were significant pre and post decreases with active rTMS in overall anxiety (Hedges g = 1.24; P = 0.02) and depressive (Hedges g = 0.85; P < 0.001) symptoms. Dropout rates at study end did not differ between active and sham rTMS groups. Regarding rTMS applied to the left DLPFC, there is only one study published to date (using a high frequency protocol), and its results showed that active rTMS seems to be superior overall to sham rTMS. Conclusions: Our exploratory meta-analysis shows that active rTMS applied to the DLPFC seems to be effective and acceptable for treating PTSD. However, the small number of subjects included in the analyses limits the generalizability of these findings. Future studies should include larger samples and deliver optimized stimulation parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chang, Chun-Hung
    Liou, Meng-Fen
    Liu, Chieh-Yu
    Lu, Wei-Hsin
    Chen, Shaw-Ji
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [32] Precision Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Left Parietal Cortex Improves Memory in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Jia, Yanli
    Xu, Luoyi
    Yang, Kehua
    Zhang, Yingchun
    Lv, Xinghui
    Zhu, Zhenwei
    Chen, Zheli
    Zhu, Yunlong
    Wei, Lili
    Li, Xia
    Qian, Mincai
    Shen, Yuedi
    Hu, Weiming
    Chen, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 13
  • [33] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex improves functional recovery in nonresponsive patients: A crossover, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study
    Xu, Chengwei
    Wu, Wanchun
    Zheng, Xiaochun
    Liang, Qimei
    Huang, Xiyan
    Zhong, Haili
    Xiao, Qiuyi
    Lan, Yue
    Bai, Yang
    Xie, Qiuyou
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [34] A sham controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder
    Watts, Bradley V.
    Landon, Barbara
    Groft, Alicia
    Yinong Young-Xu
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [35] Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial
    Hosomi, Koichi
    Shimokawa, Toshio
    Ikoma, Katsunori
    Nakamura, Yusaku
    Sugiyama, Kenji
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    Uozumi, Takenori
    Yamamoto, Takamitsu
    Saitoh, Youichi
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (07) : 1065 - 1072
  • [36] Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Broadbent, Hannah J.
    Van den Eynde, Frederique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 16 (05): : 1173 - 1181
  • [37] Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 3 Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Devices for Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trials
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Yamazaki, Ryuichi
    Kishi, Taro
    Iwata, Nakao
    Shigeta, Masahiro
    Kito, Shinsuke
    NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2022, 81 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [38] A double-blind sham-controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of refractory auditory hallucinations
    Fitzgerald, PB
    Benitez, J
    Daskalakis, JZ
    Brown, TL
    Marston, NAU
    de Castella, A
    Kulkarni, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 25 (04) : 358 - 362
  • [39] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia in patients with autism spectrum disorder: Study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled clinical trial
    Jiao, Jian
    Tan, Lu
    Zhang, Ye
    Li, Taomei
    Tang, Xiangdong
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [40] Transcranial stimulation in frontotemporal dementia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    Benussi, Alberto
    Dell'Era, Valentina
    Cosseddu, Maura
    Cantoni, Valentina
    Cotelli, Maria Sofia
    Cotelli, Maria
    Manenti, Rosa
    Benussi, Luisa
    Brattini, Chiara
    Alberici, Antonella
    Borroni, Barbara
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 6 (01) : 1 - 11