Instrumental-variable estimation of large-T panel-data models with common factors

被引:28
|
作者
Kripfganz, Sebastian [1 ]
Sarafidis, Vasilis [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Oslo, Norway
[3] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
STATA JOURNAL | 2021年 / 21卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
st0650; xtivdfreg; xtivdfreg postestimation; large-T panels; two-stage instrumental-variable estimation; common factors; interactive effects; defactoring; cross-sectional dependence; two-way error-components panel-data model; heterogeneous slope coefficients; NUMBER; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X211045558
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this article, we introduce the xtivdfreg command, which implements a general instrumental-variables (IV) approach for fitting panel-data models with many time-series observations, T, and unobserved common factors or interactive effects, as developed by Norkute et al. (2021, Journal of Econometrics 220: 416-446) and Cui et al. (2020a, ISER Discussion Paper 1101). The underlying idea of this approach is to project out the common factors from exogenous covariates using principal-components analysis and to run IV regression in both of two stages, using defactored covariates as instruments. The resulting two-stage IV estimator is valid for models with homogeneous or heterogeneous slope coefficients and has several advantages relative to existing popular approaches. In addition, the xtivdfreg command extends the two-stage IV approach in two major ways. First, the algorithm accommodates estimation of unbalanced panels. Second, the algorithm permits a flexible specification of instruments. We show that when one imposes zero factors, the xtivdfreg command can replicate the results of the popular Stata ivregress command. Notably, unlike ivregress, xtivdfreg permits estimation of the two-way error-components panel-data model with heterogeneous slope coefficients.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 686
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recursive estimation in large panel data models: Theory and practice
    Jiang, Bin
    Yang, Yanrong
    Gao, Jiti
    Hsiao, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 224 (02) : 439 - 465
  • [32] GMM estimation of spatial panel data models with common factors and a general space-time filter
    Wang, Wei
    Lee, Lung-fei
    SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2018, 13 (02) : 247 - 269
  • [33] Efficient estimation of heterogeneous coefficients in panel data models with common shocks
    Li, Kunpeng
    Cui, Guowei
    Lu, Lina
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2020, 216 (02) : 327 - 353
  • [34] Can health promotion facilitate development in fragile states?: An instrumental variable estimation with panel data
    Ha, Jiwoo
    Kim, Sun-Young
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [35] Effects of remittances on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from instrumental variable estimation with panel data
    Karmaker, Shamal Chandra
    Barai, Munim Kumar
    Sen, Kanchan Kumar
    Saha, Bidyut Baran
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2023, 83
  • [36] Fixed effects instrumental variables estimation in correlated random coefficient panel data models
    Murtazashvili, Irina
    Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 142 (01) : 539 - 552
  • [37] Estimation and Inference for Linear Panel Data Models Under Misspecification When Both n and T are Large
    Galvao, Antonio F.
    Kato, Kengo
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2014, 32 (02) : 285 - 309
  • [38] Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial dynamic panel model with endogenous spatial weights when T is small
    Qu, Xi
    Wang, Xiaoliang
    Lee, Lung-fei
    ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2016, 19 (03): : 261 - 290
  • [39] Consistent estimation of the number of dynamic factors in a large N and T panel
    Amengual, Dante
    Watson, Mark W.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2007, 25 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [40] Semiparametric GMM estimation and variable selection in dynamic panel data models with fixed effects
    Li, Rui
    Wan, Alan T. K.
    You, Jinhong
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2016, 100 : 401 - 423