Treatment options for autoimmune hepatitis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:125
|
作者
Lamers, Mieke M. H. [1 ]
van Oijen, Martijn G. H. [1 ]
Pronk, Martine [2 ]
Drenth, Joost P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Autoimmune; Hepatitis; Systematic review; CHRONIC ACTIVE HEPATITIS; LIVER-DISEASE; AZATHIOPRINE; PREDNISONE; MAINTENANCE; THERAPY; COMBINATION; REMISSION; CHALLENGES; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.037
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Predniso(lo)ne with or without azathioprine is considered the mainstay in the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but many therapeutic options are available. The primary objective of this review was to explore the published literature on the optimal induction and subsequent maintenance therapy for AIH. Methods: We performed a systematic search on electronic databases MEDLINE (1950-07.2009), Web of Science, Cochrane, and the website www.clinicaltrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on apparent beneficial treatment regimens as induction or maintenance treatment in AIH were included. Pediatric studies were excluded. We calculated relative risks (RR) for comparison of treatment options on the primary outcome measure, which was defined as clinical, biochemical and histological remission. Results: Eleven RCTs were included, of which 7 studies evaluated the induction therapy in AIH patients: 3 treatment naive (n = 253), 2 relapse (n = 53), 2 combination of naive and relapse (n = 110). The remaining 4 studies (n = 162) assessed maintenance therapy. All but one maintenance study (thymostimulin versus no therapy) studied predniso(lo)ne (PRED), azathioprine (AZA) or combination PRED + AZA. We found no differences in primary outcome between induction therapy with PRED and PRED + AZA in treatment naive patients (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.65-1.47). AZA monotherapy as induction was considered as not viable because of a high mortality rate (30%). This was similar in AIH patients who relapsed: RR for PRED versus PRED + AZA for inducing remission was not different: 0.71 (95% CI 0.37-1.39). PRED + AZA maintained remission more often than PRED (RR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.13-1.73). Also AZA maintained a higher remission rate than PRED (RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.07-1.70). Maintenance of remission was not different between PRED + AZA and AZA (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.941.20). Conclusions: Based on available RCTs, PRED monotherapy and PRED + AZA combination therapy are both viable induction therapies for AIH treatment naives and relapsers, while for maintenance therapy PRED + AZA and AZA therapy are superior to PRED monotherapy. (C) 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mavacamten Treatment for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ismayl, Mahmoud
    Abbasi, Muhannad Aboud
    Marar, Rosalyn
    Geske, Jeffrey B.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Anavekar, Nandan S.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (01)
  • [42] Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Papalia, Rocco
    D'Adamio, Stefano
    Balzani, Lorenzo Diaz
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2015, 113 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [43] Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Ta, Patrick Chieu Poa
    Hue Quyen Dinh
    Nguyen, Kim
    Lin, Samuel
    Ong, Yong Li
    Ariyawardana, Anura
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (04) : e12448
  • [44] A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of bupropion versus methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD
    Maneeton, B.
    Maneeton, N.
    Intaprasert, S.
    Woottiluk, P.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S202 - S203
  • [45] Efficacy of overactive neurogenic bladder treatment : A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Bapir, Rawa
    Bhatti, Kamran Hassan
    Eliwa, Ahmed
    Garcia-Perdomo, Herney Andres
    Gherabi, Nazim
    Hennessey, Derek
    Magri, Vittorio
    Mourmouris, Panagiotis
    Ouattara, Adama
    Perletti, Gianpaolo
    Philipraj, Joseph
    Stamatiou, Konstantinos
    Trinchieri, Alberto
    Buchholz, Noor
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 94 (04) : 492 - 506
  • [46] Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Vuilleumier, Caroline
    Scherbaum, Norbert
    Bonnet, Udo
    Roser, Patrik
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [47] Pregabalin for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Dong
    Bao, Jing-Bo
    Zhang, Kai
    Ju, Long-Fang
    Yu, Ling-Zhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (01): : 16 - 29
  • [48] Is Acupuncture Safe and Effective Treatment for Migraine? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Naguit, Noreen
    Laeeq, Sadia
    Jakkoju, Rakesh
    Reghefaoui, Tiba
    Zahoor, Hafsa
    Yook, Ji Hyun
    Rizwan, Muneeba
    Shahid, Noor ul Ain
    Mohammed, Lubna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [49] Exercise parameters in the treatment of clinical depression: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Perraton, Luke G.
    Kumar, Saravana
    Machotka, Zuzana
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (03) : 597 - 604
  • [50] Probiotics for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Vliagoftis, Harissios
    Kouranos, Vasilios D.
    Betsi, Gregoria I.
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 101 (06) : 570 - 579