A comparison of procedures for adaptive choice of location tests in flexible two-stage designs

被引:10
|
作者
Friede, TM
Kieser, M
Neuhäuser, M
Büning, H
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Dept Math & Stat, Med Stat Unit, Lancaster, England
[2] Dr Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceut, Dept Biometry, Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Med Biometry Unit, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Math & Stat, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Stat & Econometr, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
adaptive design; adaptive test; measures of skewness and tailweight; shift model; power; selector statistic;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.200390013
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although linear rank statistics for the two-sample problem are distribution free tests, their power depends on the distribution of the data. In the planning phase of an experiment, researchers are often uncertain about the shape of this distribution and so the choice of test statistic for the analysis and the determination of the required sample size are based on vague information. Adaptive designs with interim analysis can potentially overcome both problems. And in particular, adaptive tests based on a selector statistic are a solution to the first. We investigate whether adaptive tests can be usefully implemented in flexible two-stage designs to gain power. In a simulation study, we compare several methods for choosing a test statistic for the second stage of an adaptive design based on interim data with the procedure that applies adaptive tests in both stages. We find that the latter is a sensible approach that leads to the best results in most situations considered here. The different methods are illustrated using a clinical trial example.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 310
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two-Stage Adaptive Designs for Three-Treatment Bioequivalence Studies
    Grayling, Michael J.
    Mander, Adrian P.
    Wason, James M. S.
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (04): : 360 - 374
  • [22] Shrinkage estimation in two-stage adaptive designs with midtrial treatment selection
    Carreras, Maximo
    Brannath, Werner
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (10) : 1677 - 1690
  • [23] Optimizing subgroup selection in two-stage adaptive enrichment and umbrella designs
    Ballarini, Nicolas M.
    Burnett, Thomas
    Jaki, Thomas
    Jennison, Christoper
    Koenig, Franz
    Posch, Martin
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (12) : 2939 - 2956
  • [24] Confidence intervals for confirmatory adaptive two-stage designs with treatment selection
    Bebu, Ionut
    Dragalin, Vladimir
    Luta, George
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 55 (03) : 294 - 309
  • [25] Robust and Adaptive Two-stage Designs in Nonlinear Mixed Effect Models
    Lucie Fayette
    Romain Leroux
    France Mentré
    Jérémy Seurat
    The AAPS Journal, 25
  • [26] Two-stage majoritarian choice
    Koran, Sean
    Sprumont, Yves
    THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 17 (02) : 521 - 537
  • [27] Two-stage randomized response procedures as single stage procedures
    Zou, GH
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 235 - 236
  • [28] Optimal designs for two-stage inference
    Stallrich, Jonathan
    McKibben, Michael
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 56 (04) : 327 - 341
  • [29] Inference for two-stage sampling designs
    Chauvet, Guillaume
    Vallee, Audrey-Anne
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2020, 82 (03) : 797 - 815
  • [30] Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials
    Schuetz, Helmut
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 71 (03) : 271 - 281