Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes

被引:420
|
作者
Hajcak, G [1 ]
Holroyd, CB
Moser, JS
Simons, RF
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Psychol, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, Victoria, BC, Canada
关键词
expectations; feedback; event-related brain potential; error-related negativity; Ne; P300; reinforcement learning; response monitoring;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00278.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The error-related negativity (ERN) is an event-related brain potential observed when subjects receive feedback indicating errors or monetary losses. Evidence suggests that the ERN is larger for unexpected negative feedback. The P300 has also been shown to be enhanced for unexpected feedback, but does not appear to be sensitive to feedback valence. The present study evaluated the role of expectations on the ERN and P300 in two experiments that manipulated the probability of negative feedback (25%, 50%, or 75%) on a trial-by-trial basis in experiment 1, and by varying the frequency of positive and negative feedback across blocks of trials in experiment 2. In both experiments, P300 amplitude was larger for unexpected feedback; however, the ERN was equally large for expected and unexpected negative feedback. These results are discussed in terms of the potential role of expectations in processing errors and negative feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 170
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes
    Shepperd, JA
    McNulty, JK
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (01) : 85 - 88
  • [12] Metformin: good or bad for the brain?
    Tasci, Ilker
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (06)
  • [13] GOOD FOR THE BREATHING, BAD FOR THE BRAIN
    SINCLAIR, JD
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 100 (826) : 388 - 388
  • [14] Good and bad in the hibernating brain
    Strijkstra, AM
    JBIS-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH INTERPLANETARY SOCIETY, 2006, 59 (3-4): : 119 - 123
  • [15] Subcortical control of dopamine neurons: The good, the bad and the unexpected
    Stewart, R. D.
    Dommett, E. J.
    BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2006, 71 (1-3) : 1 - 3
  • [16] Innovation orientation outcomes: The good and the bad
    Simpson, Penny M.
    Siguaw, Judy A.
    Enz, Cathy A.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2006, 59 (10-11) : 1133 - 1141
  • [17] Good outcomes with a bad story Comment
    Scalea, Joseph R.
    Xie, Wen
    Vrakas, Georgios
    Gray, Stephen H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 221 (04): : 675 - 676
  • [18] Centrosomes: The good and the bad for brain development
    Marthiens, Veronique
    Basto, Renata
    BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2020, 112 (06) : 153 - 172
  • [19] Plant sterols in the brain, good or bad?
    Vanmierlo, Tim
    Rutten, Kris
    Portelius, Erik
    Blokland, Arjan
    Prickaerts, Jos
    Kuipers, Folkert
    Blennow, Kaj
    Steinbusch, Harry
    Lutjohann, Dieter
    Mulder, Monique
    CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS OF LIPIDS, 2008, 154 : S60 - S60
  • [20] Brain oscillations: Good and bad vibrations
    Holmes, Gregory L.
    Engel, Jermoe
    Ben-Ari, Yehezkel
    Muller, Robert
    Huguenard, John
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 376 - 377