The microbiological quality of seven large commercial private water supplies in the United Kingdom

被引:20
|
作者
Kay, D. [1 ]
Watkins, J.
Francis, C. A.
Wyn-Jones, A. P.
Stapleton, C. M.
Fewtrell, L.
Wyer, M. D.
Drury, D.
机构
[1] Univ Wales, River basin Dynam & Hydrol Res Grp, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Dyfed, Wales
[2] CREH Analyt, Leeds LS18 4RS, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Drinking Water Inspectorate, London SW1A 2EY, England
关键词
faecal indicators; large private water supplies; pathogen; rainfall; waterborne disease; water quality;
D O I
10.2166/wh.2007.042
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Some 1% of the UK population derives their potable water from 140,000 private water supplies (PWSs) regulated by Local Authorities. The overwhelming majority of these are very small domestic supplies serving a single property or a small number of properties. Treatment for such supplies is rudimentary or non-existent and their microbiological quality has been shown to be poor in every published study to date. Private water supplies serving commercial enterprises such as hotels, restaurants, food production premises and factories are more frequently treated and subject to closer regulation in the United Kingdom. As a result, it has been assumed that these larger commercial supplies are less likely to experience elevated faecal indicator and pathogen concentrations at the consumer tap which have been observed at small domestic supplies. This paper reports on intensive monitoring at seven commercial private water supplies (six of which were treated) spread throughout the UK serving hotels, holiday parks and food production enterprises. Daily sampling of 'potable' water, both at the consumer tap and using large volume filtration for Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. was conducted over two six week periods in the spring and autumn of 2000. This allowed the effects of short term episodic peaks in faecal indicator and pathogen concentration to be quantified. All the supplies experienced intermittent pathogen presence and only one, a chlorinated deep borehole supply, fully complied with UK water quality regulations during both periods of sampling. Poor microbiological water quality typically followed periods of heavy rainfall. This suggests that the design and installation of such systems should be undertaken only after the likely range of raw water quality has been characterised, which requires a thorough understanding of the effects of flow and seasonality on raw water quality. There is no reason to suspect that the monitored sites are uncharacteristic of other commercial supplies and the results reinforce public health concerns related to domestic supplies. Furthermore, the pattern of contamination is highly episodic, commonly lasting only a few days. Thus, the relatively infrequent regulatory monitoring of such supplies would be unlikely to identify the poor water quality episodes and does not provide the data necessary for public health protection. Although some statistical relationship was found between faecal indicator organisms and the presence of pathogens, the use of FIOs in assessments of regulatory compliance may not always provide a reliable measure of public health risk, i.e. indicator absence does not preclude pathogen presence. The results of this study suggest that a risk assessment system similar to the WHO 'Water Safety Planning' approach might offer a more appropriate regulatory paradigm for private water supplies.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 538
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Distribution of arsenic hazard in public water supplies in the United Kingdom - methods, implications for health risks and recommendations
    Polya, D. A.
    Xu, L.
    Launder, J.
    Gooddy, D. C.
    Ascott, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ARSENIC IN A CHANGING WORLD (AS2018), 2018, : 22 - 25
  • [32] Data on microbiological quality assessment of rural drinking water supplies in Tiran County, Isfahan province, Iran
    Jafari, Khadijeh
    Mohammadi, Ali Akbar
    Heidari, Zahra
    Asghari, Farzaneh Baghal
    Radfard, Majid
    Yousefi, Mahmood
    Shams, Mahmoud
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 18 : 1122 - 1126
  • [33] Flushing Temporarily Improves Microbiological Water Quality for Buildings Supplied with Chloraminated Surface Water but Has Little Effect for Groundwater Supplies
    Kim, Taegyu
    Zhao, Xiaotian
    LaPara, Timothy M.
    Hozalski, Raymond M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (13) : 5453 - 5463
  • [34] STUDIES OF WATER-QUALITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM
    POCOCK, SJ
    SHAPER, AG
    PACKHAM, RF
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1981, 18 (APR) : 25 - 34
  • [35] Private landlords and energy efficiency: Evidence for policymakers from a large-scale study in the United Kingdom
    Miu, Luciana
    Hawkes, Adam D.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 142
  • [36] Microbiological, chemical and physical quality of drinking water for commercial turkeys: a cross-sectional study
    Di Martino, G.
    Piceirillo, A.
    Giacomelli, M.
    Comin, D.
    Gallina, A.
    Capello, K.
    Buniolo, F.
    Montesissa, C.
    Bonfanti, L.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2018, 97 (08) : 2880 - 2886
  • [37] The role of alkalinity in setting water quality metrics: phosphorus standards in United Kingdom rivers
    Tappin, Alan D.
    Navarro-Rodriguez, Alba
    Comber, Sean D. W.
    Worsfold, Paul J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2018, 20 (10) : 1361 - 1372
  • [38] AN ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING TRIAL ORGANIZED AS PART OF THE UNITED-KINGDOM NATIONAL EXTERNAL MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCHEME
    SNELL, JJS
    BROWN, DFJ
    GARDNER, PS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 35 (11) : 1169 - 1176
  • [39] Regulatory-driven risk assessment to improve drinking-water quality: A case study of private water supplies in England and Wales
    Herschan, Jo
    Pond, Katherine
    Malcolm, Rosalind
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 140 : 1 - 11
  • [40] The microbiological quality of ice used to cool drinks and ready-to-eat food from retail and catering premises in the United Kingdom
    Nichols, G
    Gillespie, I
    de Louvois, J
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2000, 63 (01) : 78 - 82