Pathways to 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming based on observational and geological constraints

被引:85
|
作者
Goodwin, Philip [1 ]
Katavouta, Anna [2 ]
Roussenov, Vassil M. [2 ]
Foster, Gavin L. [1 ]
Rohling, Eelco J. [1 ,3 ]
Williams, Richard G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Natl Oceanog Ctr Southampton, Ocean & Earth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Environm Sci, Dept Earth Ocean & Ecol Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Earth Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; CARBON EMISSIONS; CLIMATE SENSITIVITY; TEMPERATURE; HEAT; PROJECTIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41561-017-0054-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
To restrict global warming to below the agreed targets requires limiting carbon emissions, the principal driver of anthropogenic warming. However, there is significant uncertainty in projecting the amount of carbon that can be emitted, in part due to the limited number of Earth system model simulations and their discrepancies with present-day observations. Here we demonstrate a novel approach to reduce the uncertainty of climate projections; using theory and geological evidence we generate a very large ensemble (3 x 10(4)) of projections that closely match records for nine key climate metrics, which include warming and ocean heat content. Our analysis narrows the uncertainty in surface-warming projections and reduces the range in equilibrium climate sensitivity. We find that a warming target of 1.5 degrees C above the pre-industrial level requires the total emitted carbon from the start of year 2017 to be less than 195-205 PgC (in over 66% of the simulations), whereas a warming target of 2 degrees C is only likely if the emitted carbon remains less than 395-455 PgC. At the current emission rates, these warming targets are reached in 17-18 years and 35-41 years, respectively, so that there is a limited window to develop a more carbon-efficient future.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Projection of vegetation distribution to 1.5°C and 2°C of global warming on the Tibetan Plateau
    Zhao, Dongsheng
    Zhu, Yu
    Wu, Shaohong
    Zheng, Du
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2021, 202
  • [22] Impacts of 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming on Eucalyptus plantations in South America
    Martins, Fabrina Bolzan
    Benassi, Rafael Bitencourt
    Torres, Roger Rodrigues
    de Brito Neto, Francisco Agustinho
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 825
  • [23] Projections of changes in ecosystem productivity under 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming
    Tian, Chenguang
    Yue, Xu
    Zhou, Hao
    Lei, Yadong
    Ma, Yimian
    Cao, Yang
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2021, 205
  • [24] Internal variability in European summer temperatures at 1.5 °C and 2 °C of global warming
    Suarez-Gutierrez, Laura
    Li, Chao
    Mueller, Wolfgang A.
    Marotzke, Jochem
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [25] Future Floods in Bangladesh under 1.5°C, 2°C, and 4°C Global Warming Scenarios
    Mohammed, Khaled
    Islam, A. K. M. Saiful
    Islam, G. M. Tarekul
    Alfieri, Lorenzo
    Khan, Md. Jamal Uddin
    Bala, Sujit Kumar
    Das, Mohan Kumar
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2018, 23 (12)
  • [26] Regional energy diversity and sovereignty in different 2 °C and 1.5 °C pathways
    Hof, A. F.
    Esmeijer, K.
    de Boer, H. S.
    Daioglou, V.
    Doelman, J. C.
    den Elzen, M. G. J.
    Gernaat, D. E. H. J.
    van Vuuren, D. P.
    ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [27] Can we limit warming to 1.5°C?
    Le Page, Michael
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2018, 240 (3199) : 6 - 6
  • [28] Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C
    Bongaarts, John
    POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2019, 45 (01) : 251 - 252
  • [29] Tibetan Plateau amplification of climate extremes under global warming of 1.5 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C
    You, Qinglong
    Wu, Fangying
    Shen, Liucheng
    Pepin, Nick
    Jiang, Zhihong
    Kang, Shichang
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2020, 192 (192)
  • [30] Projections of East Asian summer monsoon under 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming goals
    Lin Chen
    Xia Qu
    Gang Huang
    Yuanfa Gong
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2019, 137 : 2187 - 2201