PCA: Prostate Cancer, Patient-Centred Approach or both?

被引:10
|
作者
Denis, Louis [1 ]
Joniau, Steven [2 ]
Bossi, Alberto [3 ]
Baskin-Bey, Edwina [4 ]
Fitzpatrick, John M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Europa Uomo, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Urol, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[4] Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Staines, Middx, England
[5] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Professorial Surg Unit, Dublin 7, Ireland
[6] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
counselling; multidisciplinary approach; patient support; physician-patient relations; prostate cancer; shared decision-making; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; PARTICIPATION; SATISFACTION; PREFERENCES; PROVIDER; MODEL; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10859.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate differences and similarities in opinions on and expectations of prostate cancer management between physicians and patients. Two surveys on patient-specific opinions and expectations in prostate cancer management were done in 2011 among European prostate cancer specialists and patients with prostate cancer. Survey results were complemented with existing published data and with the authors' opinion. Most specialists spent 15-29 min on delivering the diagnosis, and about the same amount of time on explaining treatment options. This time was considered insufficient by 35% and 48% of patients, respectively. There was a large discrepancy between physicians' and patients' opinions about the type of provided prognostic and therapeutic information, indicating that patients may not have completely understood this information. Shared decision-making was preferred by both patients and specialists. Treatment efficacy was the most important factor determining treatment choice for both groups, while the physician's opinion or experience also had a great impact on patients' treatment choice. Patient-support groups have an important role in providing relevant information and in exchanging experiences between patients. The supportive role of partners/relatives was more appreciated when discussing treatment options than during diagnosis. Although patients' expectations are generally matched by their caring physician(s), physicians can still improve quality of care by taking adequate time for their patients, by using terminology that is easily understood by patients and by encouraging shared decision-making. A multidisciplinary team may be an important part of the treatment paradigm, with the individual patient's needs and preferences as the centre of care.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care
    Mariëlle Ouwens
    Rosella Hermens
    Marlies Hulscher
    Saskia Vonk-Okhuijsen
    Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
    René Termeer
    Henri Marres
    Hub Wollersheim
    Richard Grol
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010, 18 : 121 - 130
  • [22] Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care
    Ouwens, Marielle
    Hermens, Rosella
    Hulscher, Marlies
    Vonk-Okhuijsen, Saskia
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne
    Termeer, Rene
    Marres, Henri
    Wollersheim, Hub
    Grol, Richard
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2010, 18 (01) : 121 - 130
  • [23] Patient-centred prosthodontics
    Hancocks, S
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 53 (05) : 326 - 326
  • [24] Patient-centred diagnosis
    Mulley, Albert G., Jr.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2010, 13 (04) : 441 - 442
  • [25] Patient-centred medicine
    Lewith, George
    CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2007, 7 (03) : 250 - 252
  • [26] Patient-centred psychiatry
    O'Shea, Rory
    PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2005, 29 (07): : 276 - 276
  • [27] Patient-centred diagnosis
    Davies, Peter
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2007, 57 (538): : 413 - 413
  • [28] Patient-centred services
    Spall, JA
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2003, 13 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [29] Patient-centred care
    Goodman, Wilfred S.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (07) : 699 - 699
  • [30] Is ECT patient-centred?
    Lodge, George
    PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2008, 32 (03): : 116 - 116