Development of a 3D remote dosimetry protocol compatible with MRgIMRT

被引:13
|
作者
Mein, Stewart [1 ]
Rankine, Leith [2 ,3 ]
Adamovics, John [4 ]
Li, Harold [3 ]
Oldham, Mark [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Rider Univ, Dept Chem Biochem & Phys, Lawrenceville, NY 08648 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
3D dosimetry; MRgIMRT; optical-CT; PRESAGE; ((R)); quality assurance; remote dosimetry; IMRT;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12565
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a novel remote 3D dosimetry protocol to verify Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT) treatments. The protocol was applied to investigate the accuracy of TG-119 IMRT irradiations delivered by the MRIdian((R)) system (ViewRay((R)), Oakwood Village, OH, USA) allowing for a 48-hour delay between irradiation at a field institution and subsequent readout at a base institution. MethodsThe 3D dosimetry protocol utilizes a novel formulation of PRESAGE((R)) radiochromic dosimeters developed for high postirradiation stability and compatibility with optical-CT readout. Optical-CT readout was performed with an in-house system utilizing telecentric lenses affording high-resolution scanning. The protocol was developed from preparatory experiments to characterize PRESAGE((R)) response in relevant conditions. First, linearity and sensitivity of PRESAGE((R)) dose-response in the presence of a magnetic field was evaluated in a small volume study (4ml cuvettes) conducted under MRgRT conditions and irradiated with doses 0-15Gy. Temporal and spatial stability of the dose-response were investigated in large volume studies utilizing large field-of-view (FOV) 2kg cylindrical PRESAGE((R)) dosimeters. Dosimeters were imaged at t=1hr and t=48hrs enabling the development of correction terms to model any observed spatial and temporal changes postirradiation. Polynomial correction factors for temporal and spatial changes in PRESAGE((R)) dosimeters (C-T and C-R respectively) were obtained by numerical fitting to time-point data acquired in six irradiated dosimeters. A remote dosimetry protocol was developed where PRESAGE((R)) change in optical-density (OD) readings at time t=X (the irradiation to return shipment time interval) were corrected back to a convenient standard time t=1hr using the C-T and C-R corrections. This refined protocol was then applied to TG-119 (American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Task Group 119) plan deliveries on the MRIdian((R)) system to evaluate the accuracy of MRgRT in these conditions. ResultsIn the small volume study, in the presence of a 0.35T magnetic field, PRESAGE((R)) was observed to respond linearly (R-2=0.9996) to Co-60 irradiation at t=48hrs postirradiation, within the dose ranges of 0 to 15Gy, with a sensitivity of 0.0305(0.003) ODcm(-1)Gy(-1). In the large volume studies, at t=1hr postirradiation, consistent linear response was observed, with average sensitivity of 0.0930 +/- 0.002 ODcm(-1)Gy(-1). However, dosimeters gradually darkened with time (OD<5% per day). A small radial dependence to the dosimeter sensitivity was measured (<3% of maximum dose), which is attributed to a spherically symmetric dosimeter artifact arising from exothermic heating legacy in the PRESAGE((R)) polyurethane substrate during curing. When applied to the TG-119 IMRT irradiations, the remote dosimetry protocol (including correction terms) yielded excellent line-profile and 3D gamma agreement for 3%/3mm, 10% threshold (mean passing rate=96.6%+/- 4.0%). ConclusionA novel 3D remote dosimetry protocol is introduced for validating off-site dosimetrically complex radiotherapy systems, including MRgRT. The protocol involves correcting for temporal and spatially dependent changes in PRESAGE((R)) radiochromic dosimeters readout by optical-CT. Application of the protocol to TG-119 irradiations enabled verification of MRgRT dose distributions with high resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:6018 / 6028
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of an automatic processing application for 3D Dosimetry
    Isidoro, J.
    Rachinhas, P. J. B. M.
    Cavaco, A.
    Freitas, D.
    Paiva, R.
    Costa, G.
    Lima, J. M. P.
    Ferrer-Antunes, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 : S178 - S178
  • [2] On the feasibility of comprehensive high-resolution 3D remote dosimetry
    Juang, Titania
    Grant, Ryan
    Adamovics, John
    Ibbott, Geoffrey
    Oldham, Mark
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (07)
  • [3] Development of 3D Slicer based film dosimetry analysis
    Alexander, K. M.
    Robinson, A.
    Pinter, C.
    Fichtinger, G.
    Schreiner, L. J.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 847
  • [4] Fundamentals of 3D dosimetry
    Schreiner, L. J.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2019, 1305
  • [5] The importance of 3D dosimetry
    Low, Daniel
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2015, 573
  • [6] Protocol Optimization and Dosimetry of 3D Rotational Angiography in Pediatric Neuroangiographic Procedures
    Shkumat, N.
    Muthusami, P.
    Shroff, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [7] How feasible is remote 3D dosimetry for MR guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT)?
    Mein, S.
    Rankine, L.
    Miles, D.
    Juang, T.
    Cai, B.
    Curcuru, A.
    Mutic, S.
    Fenoli, J.
    Adamovics, J.
    Li, H.
    Oldham, M.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 847
  • [8] 3D Remote Dosimetry for MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Hybrid Approach
    Rankine, L.
    Mein, S.
    Adamovics, J.
    Cai, B.
    Curcuru, A.
    Juang, T.
    Miles, D.
    Mutic, S.
    Wang, Y.
    Oldham, M.
    Li, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3873 - 3873
  • [9] Development of deformable 3D anthropomorphic dosimetry systems for proton therapy
    Jensen, S.
    Erichsen, T.
    Jensen, M.
    Balling, P.
    Petersen, J.
    Poulsen, P.
    Muren, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1354 - S1356
  • [10] 3D printers - are they electromagnetically compatible?
    Goleman, Ryszard
    Mazurek, Pawel A.
    Holuk, Mariusz
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2022, 98 (12): : 246 - 249