Optimal wastewater allocation with the development of an SECA multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:26
|
作者
Azbari, Kosar Ebrahimzadeh [1 ]
Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat [1 ]
Golfam, Parvin [2 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Zachry Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
Optimal wastewater allocation; SECA multi-Objective decision-making method; Multi-objective non-linear programming; Optimization the overall performance of the alternatives; Lingo software; REUSE; IRRIGATION; GROUNDWATER; ADAPTATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to develop a multi-objective decision-making method, named Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for optimal ranking of wastewater allocation alternatives. This multi-objective decision-making method is for the continuous environment, meaning that experts can choose the best solution among the solutions obtained. The SECA multi-objective non-linear programming method has three objective functions: (i) maximization of the overall performance of alternatives, (ii) minimization of the deviation of criterion weights from reference point based on the within-criteria variation information, and (iii) minimization of the deviation of criterion weights based on the between-criteria variation information as well as two limitations for the weights of criteria. First, 15 criteria from different fields, including economic, socio-cultural, technological, and environmental, and six alternatives were determined for reusing wastewater, including reuse in the industrial sector, for recreational consumption, supplying environmental demand, artificial aquifer recharge, agricultural irrigation, and landscape irrigation. Then, decision-making matrix was constructed and reference points were calculated. By programming the SECA code in Lingo software and considering different beta values, different weights for criteria and alternatives were ranked. In the other words, determining the best value for beta was the most important step, so different values for beta from 0.1 to 10 were examined. Results showed that in the value of beta equal to 4, the maximum value of the objective function was obtained as 0.6926. Therefore, it was the best value for beta and the weight of the effects on water resources criterion was equal to 0.0957 and was the most important criterion, and the allocation alternative in the environmental sector with a score of 0.8575 was the best wastewater allocation alternative. Followed by the environmental sector alternative, landscape irrigation, industrial sector, artificial aquifer recharge, agricultural irrigation, and recreational consumption were placed. Therefore, water supply for the environmental sector by considering the effect of wastewater on water resources is the best alternative for optimal allocation of wastewater.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Fermatean Fuzzy ELECTRE Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making
    Zhou, Li-Ping
    Wan, Shu-Ping
    Dong, Jiu-Ying
    INFORMATICA, 2022, 33 (01) : 181 - 224
  • [32] An improved multi-criteria emergency decision-making method in environmental disasters
    Jiang, Guang-Jun
    Chen, Hong-Xia
    Sun, Hong-Hua
    Yazdi, Mohammad
    Nedjati, Arman
    Adesina, Kehinde Adewale
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (15) : 10351 - 10379
  • [33] MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS METHOD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING IN PORT ACTIVITIES
    Florin, Nicolae
    Catalin, Popa
    Haralambie, Beizadea
    Mihaela, Popescu
    GEOCONFERENCE ON ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION, SGEM 2013, VOL II, 2013, : 201 - 208
  • [34] MUPOM: A multi-criteria multi-period outranking method for decision-making in sustainable development context
    Frini, Anissa
    Ben Amor, Sarah
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 76 : 10 - 25
  • [35] An improved multi-criteria emergency decision-making method in environmental disasters
    Guang-Jun Jiang
    Hong-Xia Chen
    Hong-Hua Sun
    Mohammad Yazdi
    Arman Nedjati
    Kehinde Adewale Adesina
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 10351 - 10379
  • [36] Implementation of Dijkstra Algorithm and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Optimal Route Distribution
    Rosita, Yesy Diah
    Rosyida, Erly Ekayanti
    Rudiyanto, Muhammad Adik
    FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 : 378 - 385
  • [37] Optimal Selection of Stock Portfolios Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Jing, Dongmei
    Imeni, Mohsen
    Edalatpanah, Seyyed Ahmad
    Alburaikan, Alhanouf
    Khalifa, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [38] Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Cetkovic, Jasmina
    Knezevic, Milos
    Vujadinovic, Radoje
    Tombarevic, Esad
    Grujic, Marija
    WATER, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [39] Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Technique
    Rauf, Mudassar
    Guan, Zailin
    Sarfraz, Shoaib
    Mumtaz, Jabir
    Almaiman, Sulaiman
    Shehab, Essam
    Jahanzaib, Mirza
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXII, 2018, 8 : 343 - 348
  • [40] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155