Garnet-controlled very low velocities in the lower mantle transition zone at sites of mantle upwelling

被引:3
|
作者
Nagel, Thorsten J. [1 ]
Duesterhoeft, Erik [2 ]
Schiffer, Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Geosci, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Geosci, Kiel, Germany
[3] Univ Durham, Dept Earth Sci, Durham, England
关键词
TELESEISMIC BODY-WAVES; RECEIVER FUNCTIONS; PHASE-EQUILIBRIA; DISCONTINUITY TOPOGRAPHY; BENEATH ICELAND; THERMODYNAMICS; TEMPERATURE; COMPUTATION; MAJORITE; DIAGRAMS;
D O I
10.1111/ter.12348
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Deep mantle plumes and associated increased geotherms are expected to cause an upward deflection of the lower-upper mantle boundary and an overall thinning of the mantle transition zone between about 410 and 660km depth. We use subsequent forward modelling of mineral assemblages, seismic velocities, and receiver functions to explain the common paucity of such observations in receiver function data. In the lower mantle transition zone, large horizontal differences in seismic velocities may result from temperature-dependent assemblage variations. At this depth, primitive mantle compositions are dominated by majoritic garnet at high temperatures. Associated seismic velocities are expected to be much lower than for ringwoodite-rich assemblages at undisturbed thermal conditions. Neglecting this ultralow-velocity zone at upwelling sites can cause a miscalculation of the lower-upper mantle boundary on the order of 20km.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Elastic properties of Fe-bearing Akimotoite at mantle conditions: Implications for composition and temperature in lower mantle transition zone
    Zhao, Yajie
    Wu, Zhongqing
    Hao, Shangqin
    Wang, Wenzhong
    Deng, Xin
    Song, Jian
    FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 2 (04): : 570 - 577
  • [32] The structure of the mantle transition zone and its implications for mantle upwelling beneath the central Tibetan plateau from triplicated P-waveforms modeling
    Lv, Miaomiao
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Ding, Zhifeng
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2024, 872
  • [33] STABILITY OF HYDROUS PHASES IN THE TRANSITION ZONE AND THE UPPER MOST PART OF THE LOWER MANTLE
    OHTANI, E
    SHIBATA, T
    KUBO, T
    KATO, T
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1995, 22 (19) : 2553 - 2556
  • [34] SP-PHASES FROM THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE UPPER AND LOWER MANTLE
    FABER, S
    MULLER, G
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 70 (02) : 487 - 508
  • [35] A ubiquitous low-velocity layer at the base of the mantle transition zone
    Shen, Xuzhang
    Yuan, Xiaohui
    Li, Xueqing
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (03) : 836 - 842
  • [36] HyMaTZ: A Python']Python Program for Modeling Seismic Velocities in Hydrous Regions of the Mantle Transition Zone
    Wang, Fei
    Barklage, Mitchell
    Lou, Xiaoting
    van der Lee, Suzan
    Bina, Craig R.
    Jacobsen, Steven D.
    GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (08) : 2308 - 2324
  • [37] Receiver function image of the mantle transition zone beneath western China: Fragmented subduction and counterflow upwelling
    Tang, Zheng
    Julia, Jordi
    Mooney, Walter D.
    Wu, Yanqiang
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2024, 647
  • [38] Seismic discontinuities in the mantle transition zone and at the top of the lower mantle beneath eastern China and Korea: Influence of the stagnant Pacific slab
    Gao, Yuan
    Suetsugu, Daisuke
    Fukao, Yoshio
    Obayashi, Masayuki
    Shi, Yutao
    Liu, Ruifeng
    PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2010, 183 (1-2) : 288 - 295
  • [39] Slab Segmentation and Stacking in Mantle Transition Zone Controls Disparate Surface and Lower Mantle Subducting Rates and Complex Slab Morphology
    Li, Keqing
    Hu, Jiashun
    Li, Yida
    Zhou, Hao
    Zhang, Haijiang
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (17)
  • [40] Seismic Anisotropy in the Lower Mantle Transition Zone Induced by Lattice Preferred Orientation of Akimotoite
    Guan, Longli
    Yamazaki, Daisuke
    Tsujino, Noriyoshi
    Tange, Yoshinori
    Higo, Yuji
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (11)