Pricing equity default swaps under the jump-to-default extended CEV model

被引:23
|
作者
Mendoza-Arriaga, Rafael [1 ]
Linetsky, Vadim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Informat Risk & Operat Management Dept IROM, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, McCormick Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Default; Credit default swaps; Equity default swaps; Credit spread; Corporate bonds; Equity derivatives; Credit derivatives; CEV model; Jump-to-default extended CEV model; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00780-010-0139-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Equity default swaps (EDS) are hybrid credit-equity products that provide a bridge from credit default swaps (CDS) to equity derivatives with barriers. This paper develops an analytical solution to the EDS pricing problem under the jump-to-default extended constant elasticity of variance model (JDCEV) of Carr and Linetsky. Mathematically, we obtain an analytical solution to the first passage time problem for the JDCEV diffusion process with killing. In particular, we obtain analytical results for the present values of the protection payoff at the triggering event, periodic premium payments up to the triggering event, and the interest accrued from the previous periodic premium payment up to the triggering event, and we determine arbitrage-free equity default swap rates and compare them with CDS rates. Generally, the EDS rate is strictly greater than the corresponding CDS rate. However, when the triggering barrier is set to be a low percentage of the initial stock price and the volatility of the underlying firm's stock price is moderate, the EDS and CDS rates are quite close. Given the current movement to list CDS contracts on organized derivatives exchanges to alleviate the problems with the counterparty risk and the opacity of over-the-counter CDS trading, we argue that EDS contracts with low triggering barriers may prove to be an interesting alternative to CDS contracts, offering some advantages due to the unambiguity, and transparency of the triggering event based on the observable stock price.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 540
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pricing basket default swaps in a tractable shot noise model
    Herbertsson, Alexander
    Jang, Jiwook
    Schmidt, Thorsten
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2011, 81 (08) : 1196 - 1207
  • [32] Pricing credit default swaps under a multi-scale stochastic volatility model
    Chen, Wenting
    He, Xinjiang
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2017, 468 : 425 - 433
  • [33] The Impact of Earnings on the Pricing of Credit Default Swaps
    Callen, Jeffrey L.
    Livnat, Joshua
    Segal, Dan
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2009, 84 (05): : 1363 - 1394
  • [34] The value of the 'swap' feature in equity default swaps
    Gil-Bazo, J
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2006, 6 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [35] Irreversible investment, ambiguity and equity default swaps
    Tang, Xiaolin
    Yang, Zhaojun
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 25 (18) : 1301 - 1305
  • [36] Pricing Credit Default Swaps with Observable Covariates
    Doshi, Hitesh
    Ericsson, Jan
    Jacobs, Kris
    Turnbull, Stuart M.
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2013, 26 (08): : 2048 - 2094
  • [37] Real option, debt maturity and equity default swaps under negotiation
    Gan, Liu
    Luo, Pengfei
    Yang, Zhaojun
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 18 : 278 - 284
  • [38] THE PRICING OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS UNDER A MARKOV-MODULATED MERTON'S STRUCTURAL MODEL
    Siu, Tak
    Erlwein, Christina
    Mamon, Rogemar
    NORTH AMERICAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2008, 12 (01) : 19 - 46
  • [39] INDIFFERENCE PRICING OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS IN A MULTI-PERIOD MODEL
    Xie, Ayu
    Lin, Jianwei
    Qian, Xiaosong
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 19 (11) : 8343 - 8364
  • [40] The Pricing of Credit Default Swaps with Counterparty Risk: Interacting Intensities Model under Regime Switching
    Dong Yinghui
    RECENT ADVANCE IN STATISTICS APPLICATION AND RELATED AREAS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 616 - 620