The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships

被引:57
|
作者
Billedo, Cherrie Joy [1 ,2 ]
Kerkhof, Peter [1 ]
Finkenauer, Catrin [3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Commun Sci, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Philippines, Dept Psychol, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Child & Family Studies, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
COLLEGE-STUDENTS USE; FACEBOOK USE; INTERDEPENDENCE; COMMUNICATION; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; PREDICTORS; INTIMACY; JEALOUSY;
D O I
10.1089/cyber.2014.0469
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Social networking sites (SNS) play an increasingly important role in maintaining geographically close romantic relationships (GCRR). However, knowledge about SNS use in long-distance romantic relationships (LDRR) is still lacking. The present study examined the relative importance of SNS in maintaining LDRR compared to GCRR, particularly with regard to the use of SNS to express involvement (via relational maintenance behaviors) and to gauge a partner's involvement (via partner surveillance and jealousy) in the relationship. An online survey was conducted among predominantly young adult Facebook users who were in a romantic relationship (N=272). Results showed that participants who were in a LDRR reported higher levels of relational maintenance behaviors through SNS than participants who were in a GCRR. Also, as compared to participants who were in a GCRR, participants who were in a LDRR used SNS more for partner surveillance and experienced higher levels of SNS jealousy.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 157
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Relational closeness: Comparing undergraduate college students' geographically close and long-distance friendships
    Johnson, Amy Jannan
    Haigh, Michel M.
    Craig, Elizabeth A.
    Becker, Jennifer A. H.
    PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2009, 16 (04) : 631 - 646
  • [23] Friendships are flexible, not fragile: Turning points in geographically-close and long-distance friendships
    Becker, Jennifer A. H.
    Johnson, Amy Janan
    Craig, Elizabeth A.
    Gilchrist, Eileen S.
    Haigh, Michel M.
    Lane, Lindsay T.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2009, 26 (04) : 347 - 369
  • [24] Relationship Quality, Commitment, and Stability in Long-Distance Relationships
    Kelmer, Gretchen
    Rhoades, Galena K.
    Stanley, Scott
    Markman, Howard J.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2013, 52 (02) : 257 - 270
  • [25] Migrants' long-distance relationships and social networks in Dakar
    Fall, AS
    ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 1998, 10 (01) : 135 - 145
  • [26] Long-Distance and Proximal Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: Attachment and Closeness Predictors
    Roberts, Amber
    Pistole, M. Carole
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE COUNSELING, 2009, 12 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [27] Social Networking Sites in Romantic Relationships: Attachment, Uncertainty, and Partner Surveillance on Facebook
    Fox, Jesse
    Warber, Katie M.
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2014, 17 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [28] Changes in Friendship Commitment: Comparing Geographically Close and Long-Distance Young-Adult Friendships
    Johnson, Amy Janan
    Becker, Jennifer A. H.
    Craig, Elizabeth A.
    Gilchrist, Eileen S.
    Haigh, Michel M.
    COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2009, 57 (04) : 395 - 415
  • [29] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXTROVERSION AND SOCIAL USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES
    Wang, Kexin
    Lv, Yuxiang
    Zhang, Zheng
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2018, 46 (10): : 1597 - 1610
  • [30] Long-Distance Dating Relationships, Relationship Dissolution, and College Adjustment
    Waterman, Emily A.
    Wesche, Rose
    Leavitt, Chelom E.
    Jones, Damon E.
    Lefkowitz, Eva S.
    EMERGING ADULTHOOD, 2017, 5 (04) : 268 - 279