A systematic review on empathy measurement tools for care professionals

被引:31
|
作者
Hong, Hyeon [1 ]
Han, Areum [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Occupat Therapy, Wonju, South Korea
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Occupat Therapy, SHPB 348,1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
CONDITION REGARD SCALE; PHYSICIAN EMPATHY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/03601277.2020.1712058
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Empathic understanding of older adults is a critical attribute required for care professionals to provide quality care and relationship-based practice. To assess care professionals' empathy, identifying an appropriate empathy measurement tool with good psychometric properties is needed. This systematic review aimed to identify empathy measures that can be used for care professionals and evaluate the rigor of empathy measures. Eligible studies published between 1950 and 2018 were extracted from five databases. A five-criteria appraisal framework was used for quality appraisal of empathy measures. A total of 11 empathy measurement tools were included. Based on the scores of the appraisal framework, CARE, JSE and TES were the highest quality empathy measures, and the lowest quality measure was EQ. None of the measures was specifically developed to measure empathy of geriatric care professionals. This review addresses the limitations of the existing empathy measures and suggests future directions for research.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 83
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Analysis of Measurement and Metrics Tools: A Systematic Literature Review
    Canedo, Edna Dias
    Valenca, Karine Souza
    Santos, Giovanni Almeida
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 6970 - 6980
  • [22] Empathy Measurement in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: A COSMIN Systematic Literature Review
    Harrison, Jessica L.
    Brownlow, Charlotte L.
    Ireland, Michael J.
    Piovesana, Adina M.
    ASSESSMENT, 2022, 29 (02) : 332 - 350
  • [23] eHealth literacy measurement tools: a systematic review protocol
    Deletroz, Carole
    Allen, Marina Canepa
    Sasseville, Maxime
    Rouquette, Alexandra
    Bodenmann, Patrick
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [24] Measurement of compassion fatigue in animal health care professionals: a systematic review of available instruments and their content validity
    Noe, May Thet Nu
    Baysal, Yigit
    Masserey, Anais
    Hartnack, Sonja
    Guseva Canu, Irina
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [25] Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, and Empathy Among Health Care Professionals: A Review of the Literature
    Raab, Kelley
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE CHAPLAINCY, 2014, 20 (03) : 95 - 108
  • [26] Family history tools for primary care: A systematic review
    Mirosevic, Spela
    Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika
    Peterlin, Borut
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : 75 - 86
  • [27] Organizational Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Review of Measurement Tools
    Evans, Jenna M.
    Grudniewicz, Agnes
    Baker, G. Ross
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2016, 39 (04) : 391 - 420
  • [28] Errors in the Use of Inhalers by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review
    Plaza, Vicente
    Giner, Jordi
    Rodrigo, Gustavo J.
    Dolovich, Myrna B.
    Sanchis, Joaquin
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2018, 6 (03): : 987 - 995
  • [29] A systematic review of facilitators and barriers for professionals in providing integrated care
    Nooteboom, Laura
    Mulder, Eva
    Kuiper, Chris
    Vermeiren, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2019, 19
  • [30] A systematic review of frailty education programs for health care professionals
    Warren, Nicola
    Gordon, Emily
    Pearson, Ella
    Siskind, Dan
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    Etherton-Beer, Christopher
    Hanjani, Leila Shafiee
    Young, Adrienne M.
    Reid, Natasha
    Hubbard, Ruth E.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2022, 41 (04) : E310 - E319