Vortioxetine use may cause false positive immunoassay results for urine methadone

被引:1
|
作者
Uljon, Sacha [1 ]
Kataria, Yachana [2 ]
Flood, James G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, 55 Fruit St,GRB-554, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Boston Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Immunoassay; Urine drug screen; Vortioxetine; Methadone;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2019.08.026
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Urine immunoassays are frequently employed for methadone screening because they are relatively inexpensive and widely available. However, immunoassays are notoriously prone to false positives. We report that the use of vortioxetine (Trintellix (R) in the USA and Canada, Brintellix (R) worldwide) could cause false positives in the Roche KIMS Methadone II Urine immunoassay (MDN2). Methods: We performed a spiking study using a parent drug vortioxetine concentration of 7500 ng/ml. Results: Urine specimens from seven patients on typical vortioxetine doses tested positive for methadone in the Roche assay but negative for methadone in a confirmatory (GC/MS) assay and two other immunoassay platforms. Because of the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine and the high cross-reactivity of a metabolite in the MDN2 assay, routine use of the drug could cause false positives even without detectible parent drug in the urine. Conclusions: Vortioxetine is commonly prescribed for mood disorders, which have high prevalence in patients treated for opioid addiction. For that reason, it is important that clinicians are aware of this interference.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 3
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FALSE-POSITIVE IMMUNOASSAY RESULTS FOR URINE BENZODIAZEPINE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING OXAPROZIN (DAYPRO(TM))
    CAMARA, PD
    AUDETTE, L
    VELLETRI, K
    BREITENBECHER, P
    ROSNER, M
    GRIFFITHS, WC
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 41 (01) : 115 - 116
  • [22] Atypical Squamous Cells in the Urine: A Cause of False Positive Urine Cytology
    Ono, Jill
    Kindelberger, David
    Deshpande, Vikram
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (05) : 328 - 329
  • [23] Novel ketamine analogues cause a false positive phencyclidine immunoassay
    Skaugen, John M.
    Scoccimarro, Anthony
    Pizon, Anthony F.
    Rymer, Jacqueline A.
    Giannoutsos, Spiros
    Ekins, Sean
    Krasowski, Matthew D.
    Tamama, Kenichi
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 56 (05) : 598 - 607
  • [24] Pseudoephedrine and False-Positive Immunoassay Urine Drug Tests for Amphetamine
    DePriest, Anne Z.
    Knight, Julie L.
    Doering, Paul L.
    Black, David L.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 33 (05): : E88 - E89
  • [25] STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN URINE AND FALSE-POSITIVE IMMUNOASSAY FOR CHLAMYDIA
    WOLLENHAUPT, J
    HARTMANN, F
    ZEIDLER, H
    FROSCH, M
    LANCET, 1992, 339 (8801): : 1110 - 1110
  • [26] Solriamfetol and m-chlorophenylpiperazine cause false positive amphetamine results on urine drug screening
    Rackow, Ashley R.
    Knezevic, Claire E.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2024, 48 (02) : 126 - 129
  • [27] Can Aspergillus fumigatus conidia cause false-positive results in the galactomannan enzyme immunoassay test?
    Cabana, Angela Leitzke
    Mendes, Josiara Furtado
    Klafke, Gabriel Baracy
    Brandolt, Tchana Martinez
    Melo, Aryse Martins
    Araujo Meireles, Mario Carlos
    Xavier, Melissa Orzechowski
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA TROPICAL, 2018, 51 (03) : 387 - 389
  • [28] Quinolones and false-positive urine screening for opiates by immunoassay technology
    Baden, LR
    Horowitz, G
    Jacoby, H
    Eliopoulos, GM
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (24): : 3115 - 3119
  • [29] False-positive phencyclidine urine immunoassay screen due to tramadol
    Ly, B. T.
    Stone, J.
    Buono, C.
    Wu, A. H.
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 46 (07) : 620 - 620
  • [30] False methadone-positive urine drug screens in patients treated with quetiapine
    Cherwinski, Kathleen
    Petti, Theodore A.
    Jekelis, Albert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 46 (04): : 435 - 436