Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms?

被引:91
|
作者
Ahn, Joon Mo [1 ]
Lee, Weonvin [2 ]
Mortara, Letizia [3 ]
机构
[1] Sogang Univ, Res Inst Management Technol, Grad Sch Management Technol, BW620,35 Baekbeom Ro, Seoul 01407, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Ind Econ & Trade, Bldg C,Sejong Natl Res Complex,370 Sicheong Daero, Sejong 30147, South Korea
[3] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
关键词
(JEL): Industrial policy (O25); Management of technological innovation and R&D (O32); Government policy (O38); OPEN INNOVATION RESEARCH; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; NATIONAL SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; OPENNESS; SUPPORT; CHALLENGES; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119840
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Input-driven policy is typically designed to support R&D and contribute to the enhancement of innovation competences in individual firms. However, it is not clear whether this 'more is better' approach has contributed to the establishment of a vibrant innovation ecosystem by stimulating firms' inclination to collaborate. The current study investigates this question by analysing the data from 489 Korean innovative manufacturing firms using a propensity score matching analysis. As expected, the link to increased innovation collaborations was statistically significant between the recipients and R&D subsidies. The results show that R&D subsidies stimulate firms to choose partners more adventurously, by going outside the traditional value chains and regional boundaries. However, the impact of subsidies on innovation collaboration followed an inverted U-shaped curve: the impact in highly funded firms was smaller than that in firms that received a more modest amount. This finding suggests that government support encourages firms to work with a heterogeneous range of partners and to develop more diversified ecosystems. Our study suggests that different policy impacts, such as input and behavioural additionality, can occur simultaneously and even influence each other. Thus, there is a strong need for policy makers to develop more sophisticated policy tools for open innovation promotion.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D
    Gorg, Holger
    Strobl, Eric
    ECONOMICA, 2007, 74 (294) : 215 - 234
  • [12] The Impact of Government Subsidies on Private R&D Investment in Different Markets
    Wang, Jinglve
    Zhou, Guohua
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020 (2020)
  • [13] Do Government Incentives to Promote R&D Increase Private R&D Investment?
    Choi, Jieun
    WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 2022, 37 (02): : 204 - 228
  • [14] Government R&D subsidies and international competitiveness of labor-managed firms
    Ho, Jerry C.
    Hoang, Viet-Ngu
    Wilson, Clevo
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [15] Government R&D subsidies and the manipulative innovation strategy of Chinese renewable energy firms
    Ying, Qianwei
    Yang, Shanye
    He, Siyi
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [16] Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms? Evidence from European Framework Programmes
    Szuecs, Florian
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (03)
  • [17] Government R&D subsidies and enterprise R&D activities: theory and evidence
    Wu, Wan-Shu
    Zhao, Kai
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 391 - 408
  • [18] Systemic aspects of R&D policy subsidies for R&D collaborations and their effects on private R&D
    Engel, Dirk
    Rothgang, Michael
    Eckl, Verena
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2016, 23 (02) : 206 - 222
  • [19] Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative?
    Berube, Charles
    Mohnen, Pierre
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (01): : 206 - 225
  • [20] Selective R&D subsidies and firms' application strategies
    Sun, Yahui
    Luo, Shougui
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (11) : 979 - 982