Benchmarking nurse outcomes in Australian Magnet® hospitals: cross-sectional survey

被引:12
|
作者
Stone, L. [1 ,2 ]
Arneil, M. [1 ]
Coventry, L. [3 ,4 ]
Casey, V [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Moss, S. [1 ]
Cavadino, A. [6 ]
Laing, B. [5 ]
McCarthy, A. L. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queenland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
[7] Mater Hlth Serv, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Magnet (R); Nursing outcomes; Job satisfaction; Burnout; Practice environment; PRACTICE ENVIRONMENT SCALE; WORK INDEX; JOB-SATISFACTION; BURNOUT; QUALITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; PATIENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-019-0383-6
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Positive reports of nursing-related outcomes such as quality nursing care, nursing engagement with work and good practice environment are crucial in attaining and maintaining Magnet (R) designation. The majority of Magnet (R)-designated organisations (N = 482) are in the USA, with their aggregate nursing outcomes widely published as benchmark data. Australian Magnet (R) outcomes have not been aggregated or published to date. Methods: The aims are to benchmark educational preparation, occupational burnout, job satisfaction, intention to leave and working environment of nurses in Australian Magnet (R)-designated facilities and to determine the reliability of the Practice Environment Scale-Australia. The design is a cross-sectional multisite survey set in all three Australian Magnet (R)-designated organisations. The demographics included age, gender, level of education, years in practice, level of seniority and position title. Two items measured job satisfaction and intent to stay in current employment. The Maslach Burnout Inventory explored the three domains of nursing engagement: depersonalisation, personal achievement and emotional exhaustion. The Australian version of the Practice Environment Scale interrogated participants' perceptions of their work environments. Results: 2004 nurses participated (response rate 45.9%). Respondents' mean age was 39.2 years (range 20-72). They were predominantly female and had worked in their current facility for more than 5 years. Eighty five percent had a minimum of a Bachelor's degree. Eighty-six percent of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their current position. Eighty eight percent had no intention of leaving their current employer within the next 12 months. Participants rated their hospitals highly in all domains of the practice environment. Respondents reported less burnout in the personal accomplishment and depersonalisation domains than in the emotional exhaustion domain, in which they reported average levels of burnout. The internal consistency of the Practice Environment Scale-Australia was confirmed in this sample (Cronbach a's 0.87-0.9 for subscales and 0.89 for composite score). Conclusion: In this paper, we present nursing outcome data from all Australian Magnet (R) hospitals for the first time. This provides a benchmark that facilitates comparison with nursing outcomes published by Australian non-Magnet (R) hospitals and with international Magnet (R) organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Smoke-free hospitals in Poland - a cross-sectional survey
    Fedorowski, Jaroslaw J.
    Jankowski, Mateusz
    Buchelt, Beata
    Maksymowicz, Stanislaw
    Parascandola, Mark
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 19 (06) : 1795 - 1801
  • [22] Predictors and outcomes of nurse professional autonomy: A cross-sectional study
    Labrague, Leodoro J.
    McEnroe-Petitte, Denise M.
    Tsaras, Konstantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (01)
  • [23] The impact of nurse practice environment on patient outcomes and mediation effects of registered nurse outcomes in Middle Eastern acute care hospitals: A cross-sectional study
    Almotairy, Monir M.
    Hoffart, Nancy
    Bacon, Cynthia T.
    McCoy, Thomas P.
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 66
  • [24] Associated factors of nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: A multicentred cross-sectional study in psychiatric inpatient hospitals
    Desmet, Karel
    Bracke, Piet
    Deproost, Eddy
    Goossens, Peter J. J.
    Vandewalle, Joeri
    Vercruysse, Lieke
    Beeckman, Dimitri
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Kinnaer, Lise-Marie
    Verhaeghe, Sofie
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 30 (06) : 1231 - 1244
  • [25] Australian general practice nurse's knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional survey
    Smith, Sarah
    Sim, Jenny
    Halcomb, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2016, 25 (17-18) : 2502 - 2510
  • [26] Cross-Sectional Survey of Sleep Practices of Australian University Students
    Batten, Rachel
    Liddiard, Katrina
    Raynor, Annette J.
    Brown, Cary A.
    Stanley, Mandy
    NATURE AND SCIENCE OF SLEEP, 2020, 12 : 39 - 48
  • [27] Opioid prescribing in general practice: an Australian cross-sectional survey
    Reid, Sharon
    Day, Carolyn
    White, Natalie
    Harrison, Christopher
    Haber, Paul
    Bayram, Clare
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [28] Opioid prescribing in general practice: an Australian cross-sectional survey
    Sharon Reid
    Carolyn Day
    Natalie White
    Christopher Harrison
    Paul Haber
    Clare Bayram
    BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [29] Implementation of multimodal infection control and hand hygiene strategies in acute-care hospitals in Greece: A cross-sectional benchmarking survey
    Kritsotakis, Evangelos, I
    Astrinaki, Eirini
    Messaritaki, Argyri
    Gikas, Achilleas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2018, 46 (10) : 1097 - 1103
  • [30] Status of Emergency Signal Functions in Myanmar Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Seo, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Hoon
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Park, Junseok
    Shin, Dong Wun
    Park, Joon Min
    Kim, Hyunjong
    Jeon, Woochan
    Kim, Jung Eon
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (06) : 903 - 909