Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent vs. contemporary durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:8
|
作者
Bavishi, Chirag [1 ]
Chugh, Yashasvi [2 ,3 ]
Kimura, Takeshi [4 ]
Natsuaki, Masahiro [5 ]
Kaiser, Christoph [6 ]
Gordon, Paul [1 ]
Aronow, Herbert D. [1 ]
Abbott, Jinnette Dawn [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhode Isl Hosp, Lifespan Cardiovasc Inst, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Mt Sinai St Lukes Hosp, New York, NY USA
[3] Mt Sinai West Hosp, New York, NY USA
[4] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Saga Univ, Saga, Japan
[6] Univ Hosp, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Biodegradable polymer; Durable polymer; Drug-eluting stent; Diabetes; EVEROLIMUS; SAFETY; THROMBOSIS; OUTCOMES; EFFICACY; LEADERS;
D O I
10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) offer controlled drug elution and complete degradation of the polymer over time, eventually lowering the risk for chronic inflammation and neoatherosclerosis, which can be particularly helpful in patients with diabetes. While BP-DES and durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES) have demonstrated comparable efficacy in all-comers population, their efficacy and safety in patients with diabetes remains uncertain. Methods and results Electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BP-DES with contemporary DP-DES in patients with diabetes. Study investigators were contacted to obtain additional data. The primary outcome was efficacy in terms of target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and target-lesion revascularization (TLR). We also evaluated the following safety outcomes separately: all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and definite or probable stent thrombosis. Eleven RCTs including 5190 diabetic patients were included. At the longest available follow-up (mean 2.7 years), there was no significant difference in TLR [relative risk (RR): 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.24; P = 0.80] or TVR (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.81-1.34; P = 0.76). Safety outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and MI were similar between the two groups. Stent thrombosis rates were also similar between BP-DES and DP-DES groups (1.66% vs. 1.83%; RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.54-1.31; P = 0.45). The heterogeneity was low and fixed-effect model yielded similar results. Meta-regression analysis showed no relationship between insulin requiring diabetes and difference in TLR or stent thrombosis between BP-DES and DP-DES. Conclusion Overall, BP-DESs have similar safety and efficacy profiles compared to contemporary DP-DES in patients with diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents versus contemporary drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Juntao
    Li, Yang
    Chen, Yangyang
    Wang, Chaoyang
    Song, Xiaoyong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [32] A polymer-free dual drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial vs. polymer-based drug-eluting stents
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Iijima, Raisuke
    Schulz, Stefanie
    Pache, Juergen
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    Schoemig, Albert
    Kastrati, Adnan
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (08) : 923 - 931
  • [33] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF POLYMER FREE VS. BASED DRUG-ELUTING STENTS. A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Luo, Y.
    Liu, S.
    Zhao, X.
    Huang, L.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 128 : 290 - 290
  • [34] Polymer drug-eluting stents: is the future biodegradable?
    Waksman, Ron
    Maluenda, Gabriel
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9807): : 1900 - 1902
  • [35] Effect of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus biocompatible polymer everolimus-eluting stents: a meta-analysis
    Shang, Yong-Zhi
    Li, Bao-Yin
    Feng, Yan
    Liu, Jie-Yun
    Yang, Xiu-Ling
    Qin, Lei
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [36] COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM OUTCOMES WITH BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING STENTS AND DURABLE POLYMER DRUG ELUTING STENTS: AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Tripathi, Byomesh
    Kost, Michael
    Ashukem, Moses
    Marchbanks, Katheryne
    Biglari, David
    Sugumaran, Rajkumar
    Centorino, Ligita
    Gramze, Nickalaus
    Mehr, Ali
    Arabia, Francisco
    Su, Wilber
    Kalya, Anantharam
    Banday, Arshad
    Abbas, Firas
    Butman, Samuel
    Patel, Nachiket
    Weiss, Peter
    Hurst, Robert
    Freiman, Samuel Unzek
    Gulati, Martha
    Gopalan, Radha
    Verma, Divya Ratan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1460 - 1460
  • [37] Improved clinical outcome with biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents compared to durable polymer drug-eluting stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Andriyati, Ratna
    Firman, Doni
    Kurniawati, Yovi
    Alkatiri, Amir Aziz
    Pranata, Raymond
    Muliawan, Hary Sakti
    Rossimarina, Vienna
    Soerianata, Sunarya
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 97 (1152) : 638 - 643
  • [38] Biodegradable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare Metal Stents versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents : A Systematic Review and Bayesian Approach Network Meta-Analysis
    Kang, Si-Hyuck
    Park, Kyung Woo
    Kang, Do-Yoon
    Lim, Woo-Hyun
    Park, Kyung Taek
    Han, Jung-Kyu
    Kang, Hyun-Jae
    Koo, Bon-Kwon
    Oh, Byung-Hee
    Park, Young-Bae
    Kandzari, David
    Cohen, David
    Hwang, Seung-Sik
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B251 - B251
  • [39] Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: An Update Meta-Analysis
    Yanyu Wang
    Pingshuan Dong
    Ling Li
    Xiaoling Li
    Hongyun Wang
    Xuming Yang
    Shaoxin Wang
    Zhuanzhen Li
    Xiyan Shang
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2014, 28 : 379 - 385
  • [40] Nobori Biolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Permanent Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Danzi, Gian Battista
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Galasso, Gennaro
    Piscione, Federico
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (08) : 1858 - +