Tail Risk Early Warning System for Capital Markets Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Zongxin [1 ]
Chen, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Tail Risk Measurement; Risk Warning; AcF Model; Machine Learning Algorithms; STOCK RETURNS; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-021-10171-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Scientific and effective tail risk measurement and early warning are key points and difficulties in the identification and control of major risks in capital markets. In this paper, we use the autoregressive conditional Frechet model (AcF) to construct a tail risk measurement index for the capital market in China. The tail risk status identified by the scientific index method is used as a monitoring anchor to construct and optimize a tail risk early warning model based on machine learning algorithms. The study yields three findings. (1) The AcF model can overcome the shortcomings of traditional models in tail risk measurement and significantly improve the tail risk measurement efficiency of the capital market. (2) Tail risk synergies between equity and bond markets are significantly stronger than yield synergies, and the tail risk measure index has the role of a leading indicator of significant risk in capital markets. (3) Based on the joint test of risk status and crisis identification efficiency, the Logit model of crisis identification fails whereas the tail risk warning model optimized by machine learning algorithms can accurately identify crises and significant risks. The optimal early warning model pairings for the stock market and bond market are the oversampling-random forest algorithm and the double sampling-random forest algorithm, respectively, with out-of-sample crisis warning accuracies of 81.94% and 90.20%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 923
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Approach for Variable Selection and Prediction Model for Estimating the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Park, Jaewon
    Shin, Minsoo
    RISKS, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [42] Predicting financial crises: an evaluation of machine learning algorithms and model explainability for early warning systems
    Reimann C.
    Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 2024, 5 (1): : 51 - 83
  • [43] An early warning system based on machine learning detects huge forest loss in Ukraine during the war
    Gatti, Roberto Cazzolla
    Lobos, Rocio Beatriz Cortes
    Torresani, Michele
    Rocchini, Duccio
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2025, 58
  • [44] An innovative ensemble learning air pollution early-warning system for China based on incremental extreme learning machine
    Du, Zongjuan
    Heng, Jiani
    Niu, Mingfei
    Sun, Shaolong
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (09)
  • [45] Design and Implementation of China Financial Risk Monitoring and Early Warning System Based on Deep Learning
    Du, Peng
    Shu, Hong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 78052 - 78058
  • [46] Developing an early warning system with machine learning and post-crisis information
    Baek, Yaein
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2025,
  • [47] Towards an early warning system for sovereign defaults leveraging on machine learning methodologies
    Petropoulos, Anastasios
    Siakoulis, Vasilis
    Stavroulakis, Evangelos
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING FINANCE & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (02): : 118 - 129
  • [48] Employing Machine Learning and IoT for Earthquake Early Warning System in Smart Cities
    Abdalzaher, Mohamed S. S.
    Elsayed, Hussein A. A.
    Fouda, Mostafa M. M.
    Salim, Mahmoud M. M.
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [49] Developing an Early Warning System for Financial Networks: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach
    Purnell Jr, Daren
    Etemadi, Amir
    Kamp, John
    ENTROPY, 2024, 26 (09)
  • [50] Early Warning System for Seismic Events in Coal Mines Using Machine Learning
    Bogucki, Robert
    Lasek, Jan
    Milczek, Jan Kanty
    Tadeusiak, Michal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2016, 8 : 213 - 220