Metaplot: A new Stata module for assessing heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Poorolajal, Jalal [1 ,2 ]
Noornejad, Shahla [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Modeling Noncommunicable Dis Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0253341
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The proposed sequential and combinatorial algorithm, suggested as a standard tool for assessing, exploring, and reporting heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, is useful but time-consuming particularly when the number of included studies is large. Metaplot is a novel graphical approach that facilitates performing sensitivity analysis to distinguish the source of substantial heterogeneity across studies with ease and speed. Method Metaplot is a Stata module based on Stata's commands, known informally as "ado". Metaplot presents a two-way (x, y) plot in which the x-axis represents the study codes and the y-axis represents the values of I-2 statistics excluding one study at a time (n-1 studies). Metaplot also produces a table in the 'Results window' of the Stata software including details such as I-2 and chi(2) statistics and their P-values omitting one study in each turn. Results Metaplot allows rapid identification of studies that have a disproportionate impact on heterogeneity across studies, and communicates to what extent omission of that study may reduce the overall heterogeneity based on the I-2 and chi(2) statistics. Metaplot has no limitations regarding the number of studies or types of outcome data (binomial or continuous data). Conclusions Metaplot is a simple graphical approach that gives a quick and easy identification of the studies having substantial influences on overall heterogeneity at a glance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of old and new tests of heterogeneity in epidemiologic meta-analysis
    Takkouche, B
    Cadarso-Suárez, C
    Spiegelman, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 150 (02) : 206 - 215
  • [22] A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Crippa, Alessio
    Khudyakov, Polyna
    Wang, Molin
    Orsini, Nicola
    Spiegelman, Donna
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (21) : 3661 - 3675
  • [23] Applied Meta-Analysis with R and Stata, 2nd Edition
    Bradstreet, Thomas E.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 32 (05) : 813 - 815
  • [24] Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Meta-regression analysis
    Spineli, Loukia M.
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 158 (04) : 623 - 625
  • [25] Bias, heterogeneity, and uncertainty in meta-analysis
    Howard, James P.
    Arnold, Ahran D.
    Ahmad, Yousif
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (28) : 2712 - 2712
  • [26] On the importance of heterogeneity in meta-analysis Response
    Crowe, Brenda J.
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Schriver, Robert C.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 6 (05) : 445 - 445
  • [27] Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Bodnar, Olha
    Muhumuza, Rebecca Nalule
    Possolo, Antonio
    METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (06)
  • [28] Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Hardy, RJ
    Thompson, SG
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1998, 17 (08) : 841 - 856
  • [29] Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis
    Rukhin, Andrew L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2013, 75 (03) : 451 - 469
  • [30] Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comprehensive overview
    Stogiannis, Dimitris
    Siannis, Fotios
    Androulakis, Emmanouil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2024, 20 (01): : 169 - 199