Metaplot: A new Stata module for assessing heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Poorolajal, Jalal [1 ,2 ]
Noornejad, Shahla [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Modeling Noncommunicable Dis Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0253341
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The proposed sequential and combinatorial algorithm, suggested as a standard tool for assessing, exploring, and reporting heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, is useful but time-consuming particularly when the number of included studies is large. Metaplot is a novel graphical approach that facilitates performing sensitivity analysis to distinguish the source of substantial heterogeneity across studies with ease and speed. Method Metaplot is a Stata module based on Stata's commands, known informally as "ado". Metaplot presents a two-way (x, y) plot in which the x-axis represents the study codes and the y-axis represents the values of I-2 statistics excluding one study at a time (n-1 studies). Metaplot also produces a table in the 'Results window' of the Stata software including details such as I-2 and chi(2) statistics and their P-values omitting one study in each turn. Results Metaplot allows rapid identification of studies that have a disproportionate impact on heterogeneity across studies, and communicates to what extent omission of that study may reduce the overall heterogeneity based on the I-2 and chi(2) statistics. Metaplot has no limitations regarding the number of studies or types of outcome data (binomial or continuous data). Conclusions Metaplot is a simple graphical approach that gives a quick and easy identification of the studies having substantial influences on overall heterogeneity at a glance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metaplot: A Novel Stata Graph for Assessing Heterogeneity at a Glance
    Poorolajal, J.
    Mahmoodi, M.
    Majdzadeh, R.
    Fotouhi, A.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 39 (02) : 102 - 104
  • [2] Meta-analysis in Stata using gllamm
    Bagos, Pantelis G.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2015, 6 (04) : 310 - 332
  • [3] Applied meta-analysis with R and Stata
    Riley, Richard D.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 63 (08) : 1745 - 1746
  • [4] Applied Meta-Analysis with R and Stata
    Chowdhry, Amit K.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2022, 185 (02) : 728 - 729
  • [5] Assessing the robustness of direct meta-analysis in the presence of heterogeneity
    Ainsworth, Claire
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (10) : 1009 - 1025
  • [6] ASSESSING THE ROBUSTNESS OF DIRECT META-ANALYSIS IN THE PRESENCE OF HETEROGENEITY
    Ainsworth, C. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A771 - A771
  • [7] Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
    Chaimani, Anna
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Spyridonos, Panagiota
    Salanti, Georgia
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [8] Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis
    Knapp, G
    Biggerstaff, BJ
    Hartung, J
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (02) : 271 - 285
  • [9] A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Kulinskaya, Elena
    Hoaglin, David C.
    Bakbergenuly, Ilyas
    Newman, Joseph
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2021, 12 (06) : 711 - 730
  • [10] ASSESSING THE ROBUSTNESS OF NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS IN THE PRESENCE OF HETEROGENEITY
    Ainsworth, C. M.
    Vickers, A. D.
    Le Moine, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A767 - A767