Breast cancers missed by screening radiologists can be detected by reading mammograms at a distance

被引:1
|
作者
Schreutelkamp, Ineke L. [1 ]
Kwee, Robert M. [2 ]
Veekmans, Peter [3 ]
Adriaensen, Miraude E. A. P. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bevolkingsonderzoek Zuid, Australielaan 12, NL-6199 AA Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Henri Dunantstr 5, NL-6419 PC Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] SJG Weert, Dept Med Imaging, Postbox 29, NL-6000 AA Weert, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Detection; Mammography; Screening; Test set; CARCINOMAS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s11845-018-1828-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundDuring locally organized quality assurance evaluation sessions for screening radiologists, we noticed that individual screening radiologists did miss tumours which in our opinion could be detected at a distance.AimTo determine whether tumours missed by individual screening radiologists can be detected at a distance.MethodsTwenty-eight screening mammograms of 28 females (mean age 63years, range 49-73) with a pathologically proven malignant tumour missed by individual screening radiologists were mixed with 56 normal screening mammograms of 56 females (mean age 63years, range 53-74). This test set was independently assessed by a senior screening radiologist and by a radiology resident without prior training in screening mammography at 1.5m distance from the screen display. Readers were unaware of the prevalence of pathologically proven malignant tumours in the test set. Primary outcome was whether the reader would recall the woman.ResultsThe senior screening radiologist recalled 28 of 28 women with a pathologically proven malignant tumour (sensitivity of 100%) and 16 of 56 women without pathology (specificity of 71%). The radiology resident recalled 25 of 28 women with a pathologically proven malignant tumour (sensitivity of 89%) and 10 of 56 women without pathology (specificity of 82%).ConclusionSome malignant tumours missed by an individual screening radiologist can be detected from 1.5m distance. Therefore, we recommend that screening radiologists consciously take a distant view before closely evaluating the mammogram in detail.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 293
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY OF PREVALENT AND INCIDENT CANCERS DETECTED BY BREAST SCREENING
    ANDERSON, TJ
    ALEXANDER, F
    CHETTY, U
    KIRKPATRICK, A
    ROBERTS, MM
    LAMB, J
    LUTZ, W
    FORREST, APM
    MUIR, B
    HUGGINS, A
    LANCET, 1986, 1 (8480): : 519 - 523
  • [42] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Carl A Tupper
    Anthony J Maxwell
    Susan Astley
    Megan Bydder
    Soujanya Gadde
    Elaine Harkness
    Yit Y Lim
    Mary Wilson
    Julie Morris
    Breast Cancer Research, 17
  • [43] CONSISTENCY WITHIN AND BETWEEN RADIOLOGIST READING MAMMOGRAMS IN A SCREENING PROGRAM FOR BREAST CANCER
    Redondo, A.
    Comas, M.
    Macia, F.
    Castells, X.
    Molins, E.
    Casamitjana, M.
    Carlos, R.
    Ferrer, F.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 : 44 - 45
  • [44] Variations in screening outcome among pairs of screening radiologists at non-blinded double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study
    Klompenhouwer, E. G.
    Duijm, L. E. M.
    Voogd, A. C.
    den Heeten, G. J.
    Nederend, J.
    Jansen, F. H.
    Broeders, M. J. M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (05) : 1097 - 1104
  • [45] Can a limited double reading (second opinion) of initially recalled breast ultrasound screening examinations improve radiologists' performances?
    Gur, David
    Harnist, Kimberly
    Gizienski, Terri-Ann
    Zuley, Margarita
    Hakim, Christiane
    Lu, Amy
    Sumkin, Jules
    Abrams, Gordon
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Kelly, Amy E.
    Tyma, Cathy S.
    Chang, Thomas
    Bohm-Velez, Marcella
    Sobolewski, Robin
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 10577
  • [46] Potential of CAD (computer-assisted diagnosis) to aid radiologists in the detection of frequently missed breast cancers
    Schmidt, RA
    Newstead, GM
    Linver, MN
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 472 - 472
  • [47] Factors associated with breast screening radiologists’ annual mammogram reading volume in Italy
    Doralba Morrone
    Livia Giordano
    Franca Artuso
    Daniela Bernardi
    Chiara Fedato
    Alfonso Frigerio
    Daniela Giorgi
    Carlo Naldoni
    Gianni Saguatti
    Daniela Severi
    Mario Taffurelli
    Daniela Terribile
    Leonardo Ventura
    Lauro Bucchi
    La radiologia medica, 2016, 121 : 557 - 563
  • [48] Factors associated with breast screening radiologists' annual mammogram reading volume in Italy
    Morrone, Doralba
    Giordano, Livia
    Artuso, Franca
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Fedato, Chiara
    Frigerio, Alfonso
    Giorgi, Daniela
    Naldoni, Carlo
    Saguatti, Gianni
    Severi, Daniela
    Taffurelli, Mario
    Terribile, Daniela
    Ventura, Leonardo
    Bucchi, Lauro
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2016, 121 (07): : 557 - 563
  • [49] Cost-Effectiveness of Double Reading versus Single Reading of Mammograms in a Breast Cancer Screening Programme
    Posso, Margarita
    Carles, Misericordia
    Rue, Montserrat
    Puig, Teresa
    Bonfill, Xavier
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [50] Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: A detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading
    Cawson, J. N.
    Nickson, C.
    Amos, A.
    Hill, G.
    Whan, A. B.
    Kavanagh, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (05) : 442 - 449