Diagnostic usefulness of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody serology - Comparative evaluation of commercial indirect fluorescent antibody kits and enzyme immunoassay kits

被引:0
|
作者
Lim, LCL
Taylor, JG
Schmitz, JL
Folds, JD
Wilkman, AS
Falk, RJ
Jennette, JC
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina Hosp, Clin Immunol Lab, William W McLendon Clin Labs, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
ANCA; antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; serology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCAs) are increasingly used as serologic markers for pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis and small vessel vasculitis. Many hospital laboratories and referral laboratories use commercial assay kits to detect ANCAs, despite inadequate documentation in the medical literature of kit performance. We evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 3 commercial indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) kits and 7 commercial enzyme immunoassay (ELA) kits for several ANCA subtypes. Serum samples from 396 patients with a variety of renal diseases were analyzed, including 146 patients with pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis with or without systemic vasculitis. With I exception, the kits had more than 90% agreement with the reference standard and gave results similar to those of research laboratories. IFA diagnostic sensitivity ranged from 81% to 91% and EIA sensitivity from 75% to 84%. Maximum specificity was obtained with combined IFA and EIA. Diagnostic specificity was more than 70% for 2 of 3 IFA kits and at least 90% for 5 of 7 EIA kits. Predictive values varied with clinical manifestations. Most commercial IFA and EIA kits that were evaluated provide acceptably accurate analytic results.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 369
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. III. Comparative performance characteristics of academic and manufacturers' laboratories
    Fritzler, MJ
    Wiik, A
    Tan, EM
    Smolen, JS
    McDougal, JS
    Chan, EKL
    Gordon, TP
    Hardin, JA
    Kalden, JR
    Lahita, RG
    Maini, RN
    Reeves, WH
    Rothfield, NF
    Takasaki, Y
    Wilson, M
    Byrd, MG
    Slivka, L
    Koziol, JA
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 30 (11) : 2374 - 2381
  • [23] EVALUATION OF ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY (EIA) KITS FOR HEPATITIS-B SURFACE-ANTIGEN (HBSAG), HEPATITIS-B SURFACE ANTIBODY (HBSAB) AND HEPATITIS-B CORE ANTIBODY (B CORE AB)
    WIMMER, C
    DIPAOLA, J
    MERCER, W
    NOURI, N
    SALINAS, R
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1989, 35 (06) : 1207 - 1207
  • [24] A Comparative Evaluation of Antigen-Specific Sandwich Immunoassay and Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IIF) in Detecting Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies: Are We Ready to Replace IIF with ELISA as the Primary Screening Method?
    Deka, Sangeeta
    Kalita, Deepjyoti
    Shankar, Ravi
    Rekha, U. Sasi
    Sindhwani, Girish
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY PHYSICIANS, 2021, 13 (03) : 286 - 290
  • [25] COMPARISON OF 6 COMMERCIAL HUMAN T-CELL LYMPHOTROPIC VIRUS TYPE-I (HTLV-I) ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY KITS FOR DETECTION OF ANTIBODY TO HTLV-I AND HTLV-II
    COSSEN, C
    HAGENS, S
    FUKUCHI, R
    FORGHANI, B
    GALLO, D
    ASCHER, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (03) : 724 - 725