Fracture Mechanism and Fracture Toughness at the Interface Between Cortical and Cancellous Bone

被引:7
|
作者
Shitole, Pankaj [1 ]
Gupta, Arpan [1 ]
Ghosh, Rajesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Sch Engn, Mandi 175005, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
fracture toughness; cortical and cancellous interface; corticellous bone; stress intensity factor; elastic-plastic fracture mechanics; J integral; COLLAGEN CROSS-LINKS; NONENZYMATIC GLYCATION; ORIENTATION; DEPENDENCE; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1115/1.4044093
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The microstructure at the interface of cortical and cancellous bone is quite complicated. The fracture mechanisms at this location are necessary for understanding the comprehensive fracture of the whole bone. The goal of this study is to identify fracture toughness in terms of J integral and fracture mechanism at the interface between cortical and cancellous bone. For this purpose, single edge notch bend (SENB) specimens were prepared from bovine proximal femur according to ASTM-E399 standard. Bone samples were prepared such that half of the sample width consists of cortical bone and other half of the width was cancellous bone; this interfacial bone is referred as a corticellous bone. Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics was used to measure fracture toughness. The J integral (both elastic and plastic) was used to quantify the fracture toughness. The plastic part of J integral value (J(pl)) of corticellous specimen was 9310 J m(-2), and shown to be 27 times of the J integral of the elastic part (J(el)), 341 J m(-2). The total J integral of the corticellous bone was found to be 9651 J m(-2), which is close to two times of the cortical bone, 4731 J m(-2). This study observed that J integral of corticellous bone is higher than the cortical bone since more energy is required for plastic deformation of corticellous bone due to crack branches and slowdown at the interface between cortical and cancellous bone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Orthogonal cutting of cortical bone: Temperature elevation and fracture toughness
    Feldmann, Arne
    Ganser, Philipp
    Nolte, Lutz
    Zysset, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2017, 118 : 1 - 11
  • [22] A critical evaluation of cortical bone fracture toughness testing methods
    Dapaah, Daniel
    Willett, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2022, 134
  • [23] Assessment of bovine cortical bone fracture behavior using impact microindentation as a surrogate of fracture toughness
    Jahani, Babak
    Vaidya, Rachana
    Jin, James M.
    Aboytes, Donald A.
    Broz, Kaitlyn S.
    Krothapalli, Siva
    Pujari, Bhanuteja
    Baig, Walee M.
    Tang, Simon Y.
    JBMR PLUS, 2024, 8 (02)
  • [24] Authors' response to "comments on 'measurement of the microstructural fracture toughness of cortical bone using indentation fracture'"
    Mullins, L. P.
    Bruzzi, M. S.
    McHugh, P. E.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 41 (11) : 2602 - 2603
  • [25] Interfacial fracture toughness of synthetic bone-cement interface
    Department of Mechanical and Design Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Anglesea Building, Anglesea Road, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, United Kingdom
    Key Eng Mat, 2006, (251-256):
  • [26] Interfacial fracture toughness of synthetic bone-cement interface
    Tong, J
    FRACTURE OF MATERIALS: MOVING FORWARDS, 2006, 312 : 251 - 256
  • [27] Bone collagen network integrity and transverse fracture toughness of human cortical bone
    Willett, Thomas L.
    Dapaah, Daniel Y.
    Uppuganti, Sasidhar
    Granke, Mathilde
    Nyman, Jeffry S.
    BONE, 2019, 120 : 187 - 193
  • [28] Effect of Orientation on Elastic-plastic Fracture Toughness of Cortical Bone
    Sharma, N. K.
    Sehgal, D. K.
    Pandey, R. K.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING, WCE 2011, VOL III, 2011, : 2298 - 2302
  • [30] Fracture toughness of bone at the microscale
    Aldegaither, Nouf
    Sernicola, Giorgio
    Mesgarnejad, Ataollah
    Karma, Alain
    Balint, Daniel
    Wang, Jianglong
    Saiz, Eduardo
    Shefelbine, Sandra J.
    Porter, Alexandra E.
    Giuliani, Finn
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2021, 121 : 475 - 483