Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options

被引:91
|
作者
Brink, Corjan [1 ]
Vollebergh, Herman R. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
van der Werf, Edwin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, CentER, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sustainabil Ctr, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Wageningen Univ, Environm Econ & Nat Resources Grp, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] CESifo, Munich, Germany
关键词
European Union Emission Trading System; Auction reserve price; Carbon tax; Price floor; Banking; Computable general equilibrium; CLIMATE POLICY; BANKING; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies various options to support allowance prices in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), such as adjusting the cap, an auction reserve price, and fixed and variable carbon taxes in addition to the EU ETS. We use a dynamic computable general equilibrium model that explicitly allows for allowance banking and for a detailed cost-effectiveness analysis at the EU Member State level. We find that tightening the cap provides an ad hoc solution to the fundamental issue of the robustness of the effective carbon price, while introducing a price component to the ETS brings structural carbon price support in times of negative demand shocks for emission allowances. These price-based policies still benefit from the intertemporal flexibility through the banking provision in the EU ETS by re-allocating emissions over time with stronger emission reductions in early years and emission increases in later years. A higher emission price has a larger negative impact on the new Member States' economies than on other Member States. Furthermore, introducing a carbon tax in addition to the EU ETS decreases the price of allowances, resulting in welfare gains for net buyers of allowances while net sellers are worse off. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 617
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hedging Carbon Price Risk on EU ETS: A Comparison of Green Bonds from the EU, US, and China
    Nguyen, Nhung Thi
    Nguyen, Mai Thi Ngoc
    Do, Trang Thi Huyen
    Le, Truong Quang
    Nguyen, Nhi Hoang Uyen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [42] EU ETS: The wrong approach
    Young, Nancy
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2012, 50 (08) : 3 - 3
  • [43] EU ETS and the waterbed effect
    Rosendahl, Knut Einar
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (10) : 734 - 735
  • [44] EU ETS and the waterbed effect
    Knut Einar Rosendahl
    Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9 : 734 - 735
  • [45] After monetary policy, climate policy: is delegation the key to EU ETS reform?
    Grosjean, G.
    Acworth, W.
    Flachsland, C.
    Marschinski, R.
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [46] Origins and Development of the EU ETS
    Frank J. Convery
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 43 : 391 - 412
  • [47] The EU's ETS at a glance
    Thinnes, Billy
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2010, 89 (01): : 17 - 17
  • [48] Price Break Points and Impact Process Evaluation in the EU ETS
    Jia, Junjun
    Wu, Huaqing
    Zhu, Xiaoxuan
    Li, Jingwei
    Fan, Ying
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (08) : 1691 - 1714
  • [49] Has EU ETS caused carbon leakage in the EU carbon-intensive industries?A study from the perspective of bilateral trade
    Hui Zhou
    Jichuan Sheng
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2015, (02) : 132 - 138
  • [50] Has EU ETS caused carbon leakage in the EU carbon-intensive industries? A study from the perspective of bilateral trade
    Zhou, Hui
    Sheng, Jichuan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 13 (02) : 132 - 138