Comet C/2011 J2 (LINEAR) nucleus splitting: Dynamical and structural analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Manzini, Federico [1 ,2 ]
Oldani, Virginio [1 ,2 ]
Hirabayashi, Masatoshi [3 ]
Behrend, Raoul [4 ]
Crippa, Roberto [1 ,2 ]
Ochner, Paolo [5 ]
Navarro Pina, Jose Pablo [6 ]
Haver, Roberto [7 ]
Baransky, Alexander [8 ]
Bryssinck, Eric [9 ]
Dan, Andras [1 ,2 ]
De Queiroz, Jose [10 ]
Frappa, Eric [11 ]
Lavayssiere, Maylis [12 ]
机构
[1] Stn Astron Sozzago, I-28060 Sozzago, Italy
[2] Osservatorio Tradate, FOAM13, Tradate, Italy
[3] Purdue Univ, Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Observ Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] INAF Astron Observ Padova, Padua, Italy
[6] Asociac Astron Mula, Murcia, Spain
[7] Osservatorio Frasso Sabino, Frasso Sabino, Italy
[8] Kyiv Univ, Astron Observ, Kiev, Ukraine
[9] BRIXIIS Observ, Kruibeke, Belgium
[10] Sternwarte Mirasteilas, Falera, Switzerland
[11] St Etienne Planetarium, St Etienne, France
[12] Observ Bak, Cannes, France
关键词
Comets; Comet C/2011 J2 (LINEAR); Spin axis; Rotation; Break-up; ROTATIONAL BREAKUP; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; RELATIVE MOTIONS; HALE-BOPP; PERIOD; 67P/CHURYUMOV-GERASIMENKO; FRAGMENTS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pss.2016.04.004
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
After the discovery of the breakup event of comet C/2011 J2 in August 2014, we followed the primary body and the main fragment B for about 120 days in the context of a wide international collaboration. From the analysis of all published magnitude estimates we calculated the comet's absolute magnitude H=10.4, and its photometric index n=1.7. We also calculated a water production of only 110 kg/s at the perihelion. These values are typical of a low-activity, long-period or new comet. Analysis of the motion of fragment B over the observation period showed that the first breakout event likely occurred between 12 July and 30 July 2014. Nucleus B remained persistently visible throughout the 4-month observation period. The projected separation velocity of nucleus B from the parent body was 4.22 m/s at the time of the breakup and 12.7 m/s at the end of the observation period, suggesting that nucleus B was subjected to a constant deceleration a=6.87.10(-7) m/s(2). The spin period of the main nucleus was estimated as 4.56 +/- 0.05 h by photometric analysis. The structural analysis of the comet showed a cohesive strength of the nucleus greater than similar to 0.9 kPa; assuming a bulk density of 500 kg/m(3), with a rotation period of 4.56 h the cometary nucleus might have failed structurally, especially if the body was elongated. These results suggest that the nucleus of comet C/2011 J2 has an elongated shape, with a ratio of the semi-minor axis to the semi-major axis beta < 0.675; the semi-major axis of the pristine nucleus could be larger than 8 km. From this study, we propose that rotational disruption, possibly combined with sublimation pressure, was a reasonable explanation for the breakup event in comet C/2011 J2. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 23
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Split Comet C/2001 A2 (LINEAR)
    Emmanuel Jehin
    Hermann Boehnhardt
    Zdenek Sekanina
    Xavier Bonfils
    Oliver Schütz
    Jean-Luc Beuzit
    Malvina Billeres
    Gordon J. Garradd
    Pierre Leisy
    Franck Marchis
    Antonio Más
    Livia Origlia
    Daniel Scarpa
    Daniel Thomas
    Gian Paolo Tozzi
    Earth, Moon, and Planets, 2002, 90 : 147 - 151
  • [22] CN, NH2, and dust in the atmosphere of comet C/1999 J3 (LINEAR)
    Korsun, PP
    Jockers, K
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2002, 381 (02) : 703 - 708
  • [23] CN, NH2, and dust in the atmosphere of comet C/1999 J3 (LINEAR)
    Korsun, P.P. (korsun@mao.kiev.ua), 1600, EDP Sciences (381):
  • [24] Split Comet C/2001 A2 (LINEAR)
    Jehin, E
    Boehnhardt, H
    Sekanina, Z
    Bonfils, X
    Schütz, O
    Beuzit, JL
    Billeres, M
    Garradd, GJ
    Leisy, P
    Marchis, F
    Más, A
    Origlia, L
    Scarpa, D
    Thomas, D
    Tozzi, GP
    EARTH MOON AND PLANETS, 2002, 90 (1-4): : 147 - 151
  • [25] EIGENSTATES OF COMPLEX LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF J1,J2,J3 FOR ANY REPRESENTATION OF SU(2)
    BACRY, H
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 1978, 19 (05) : 1192 - 1195
  • [26] Tangent Orbital Rendezvous Using Linear Relative Motion with J2 Perturbations
    Zhang, Gang
    Wang, Dongzhe
    Cao, Xibin
    Sun, Zhaowei
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013
  • [27] Linear polarization measurements of Comet C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy) from STEREO
    Thompson, W. T.
    ICARUS, 2015, 261 : 122 - 132
  • [28] SPIN-ORBIT COUPLING EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ORDER FROM J2 AND C2J2
    JUNGEN, M
    THEORETICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1972, 27 (01): : 33 - &
  • [29] Dynamic Analysis of Europa Probe Considering J2 Perturbation of Jupiter
    Huang, Xuxing
    Masdemont, Josep J.
    Li, Shuang
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2024, 47 (01) : 156 - 164
  • [30] Dynamical Structure Factor of the J1 - J2 Heisenberg Model on the Triangular Lattice: Magnons, Spinons, and Gauge Fields
    Ferrari, Francesco
    Becca, Federico
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2019, 9 (03):