Recommended practice regarding selection of sensitivity analysis methods applied to microbial food safety process risk models

被引:23
|
作者
Mokhtari, A [1 ]
Frey, HC [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Depot Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2005年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
sensitivity analysis; microbial food safety process risk model; variability; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1080/10807030590949672
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A guideline is presented for selection of sensitivity analysis methods applied to microbial food safety process risk (MFSPR) models. The guideline provides useful boundaries and principles for selecting sensitivity analysis methods for MSFPR models. Although the guideline is predicated on a specific branch of risk assessment models related to food-borne diseases, the principles and recommendations provided are typically generally applicable to other types of risk models. Applicable situations include: prioritizing potential critical control points; identifying key sources of variability and uncertainty; and refinement, verification, and validation of a model. Based on the objective of the analysis, characteristics of the model under study, amount of detail expected from sensitivity analysis, and characteristics of the sensitivity analysis method, recommendations for selection of sensitivity analysis methods are provided. A decision framework for method selection is introduced. The decision framework can substantially facilitate the process of selecting a sensitivity analysis method.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 605
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and Analytic Hierarchical Process Applied for Reduction of Environmental Risk in Supplier Selection to Thermoplastic Industry
    da Silva, Flavia Cristina
    Shibao, Fabio Ytoshi
    Henriques Librantz, Andre Felipe
    de Oliveira Neto, Geraldo Cardoso
    Nagaki, Lincoln
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 10 (01) : 73 - 89
  • [22] Finding factors influencing risk: Comparing Bayesian stochastic search and standard variable selection methods applied to logistic regression models of cases and controls
    Swartz, Michael D.
    Yu, Robert K.
    Shete, Sanjay
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (29) : 6158 - 6174
  • [23] Risk early warning and control of food safety based on an improved analytic hierarchy process integrating quality control analysis method
    Ma, Bo
    Han, Yongming
    Cui, Shiying
    Geng, Zhiqiang
    Li, Hongda
    Chu, Chong
    FOOD CONTROL, 2020, 108
  • [24] A Risk and Hazard Analysis Model for the Production Process of a New Meat Product Blended With Germinated Green Buckwheat and Food Safety Awareness
    Atambayeva, Zhibek
    Nurgazezova, Almagul
    Rebezov, Maksim
    Kazhibayeva, Galiya
    Kassymov, Samat
    Sviderskaya, Diana
    Toleubekova, Sandugash
    Assirzhanova, Zhanna
    Ashakayeva, Rysqul
    Apsalikova, Zukhra
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 9
  • [25] Use of global sensitivity analysis in quantitative microbial risk assessment: Application to the evaluation of a biological time temperature integrator as a quality and safety indicator for cold smoked salmon
    Ellouze, M.
    Gauchi, J. -P.
    Augustin, J-C
    FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (04) : 755 - 769
  • [26] Development and application of efficient methods for the forward propagation of epistemic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis within complex broad-scale flood risk system models
    Gouldby, B. P.
    Sayers, P. B.
    Panzeri, M. C.
    Lanyon, J. E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2010, 37 (07) : 955 - 967
  • [27] Training in modern statistical methodologies and software tools for the definition and analysis of (stochastic) quantitative microbial risk assessment models with a comparison between the Hungarian and Spanish food supply chains
    Pleva, Daniel
    Garre, Alberto
    Escamez, Pablo S. Fernandez
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [28] Risk Analysis of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Process: Failure Mode, Effect, and Criticality Analysis and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point Methods Integration Based on Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Product ANNEX 20 (February 2008)
    Gianassi, S.
    Bisin, S.
    Bindi, B.
    Spitaleri, I.
    Bambi, F.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) : 2252 - 2253