Do common owners influence corporate social responsibility? Firm-level evidence from China

被引:9
|
作者
Yan, Suyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, 169 Shuanggang East St, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Common owners; Corporate social responsibility; State-owned enterprises; Corporate strategy; Stock returns; Financial constraints; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; GOVERNANCE; PHILANTHROPY; SHAREHOLDERS; INCENTIVES; MANAGEMENT; COMPANIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjar.2021.05.005
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2018, this article explores the influence of common owners on corporate social responsibility (CSR). The results show that common owners significantly promote CSR investment, indicating that increased CSR represents a bright side to common owners, in contrast to their anticompetitive effect. Further analysis shows that the nature of state ownership significantly weakens the positive relationship between common owners and CSR investment. Prospector firms strengthen the positive influence of common owners on CSR investment, whereas defender firms weaken the effect. Moreover, common owners benefit from increasing CSR investment, and co-owned firms benefit by easing their financial constraints when they invest or increase their investment in social responsibility. The findings enhance the outstanding of how common owners affect corporate behavior and enrich the literature on common ownership and CSR investment. (C) 2021 Sun Yat-sen University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 339
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Financial constraints in China: Firm-level evidence
    Poncet, Sandra
    Steingress, Walter
    Vandenbussche, Hylke
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 21 (03) : 411 - 422
  • [42] How Does Firm-Level Economic Policy Uncertainty Affect Corporate Innovation? Evidence from China
    Zheng, Suyi
    Wen, Jiandong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [43] Identifying the Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Corporate Credit Risk: Firm-level Evidence from China
    Zhou, Chen-Kai
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (13) : 3853 - 3867
  • [44] The effect of voluntary and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on firm profitability: Evidence from China
    Xue, Shuyu
    Chang, Qi
    Xu, Jingwen
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 77
  • [45] DO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT AND INNOVATION INFLUENCE EXPORT INTENSITY? FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE FROM TUNISIA
    Sdiri, Hanen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (06)
  • [46] FIRM OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL INSURANCE INEQUALITY IN TRANSITIONAL CHINA: EVIDENCE FROM A LARGE PANEL OF FIRM-LEVEL DATA
    Gao, Qin
    Rickne, Johanna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2014, 16 (01) : 2 - 25
  • [47] Social trust and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China
    Chen, Xiangyu
    Wan, Peng
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (02) : 485 - 500
  • [48] Do negative investor attitudes drive corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Tong, Lijing
    Wen, Wen
    Xie, Lu
    Wu, Bin
    BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2022, 31 (01): : 239 - 256
  • [49] Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
    Liu, Qiang
    Ge, Guoqing
    Ning, Chong
    Tao, Xiaobo
    Sun, Yongbo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [50] Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance? Empirical Evidence from Harare, Zimbabwe
    Makanyeza, Charles
    Chitambara, Tendai Linah
    Kakava, Nicholas Zivengwa
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN BUSINESS, 2018, 19 (02) : 155 - 173