Simulation of pesticide leaching in the field and in zero-tension lysimeters

被引:25
|
作者
Boesten, Jos J. T. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL | 2007年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2136/vzj2007.0067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Zero-tension lysimeters play an important role in groundwater risk assessments for pesticides in the European Union. In these assessments, measured lysimeter leachate concentrations are usually used directly for decision making. When doing so, one assumes (i) that the lysimeter bottom boundary condition itself did not lead to underestimating field leaching concentrations, (ii) that the number of application years and the duration of the lysimeter study were adequate to measure the maximum concentration in time, and (iii) that the pesticide-lysimeter system considered was sufficiently vulnerable with respect to leaching. These assumptions were tested using simulations with a Darcian water flow model combined with a chromatographic pesticide leaching model. The scenario consisted of a layered light-textured soil cropped with cereals and of multiyear weather data. The groundwater level in the field usually fluctuated between 0.7 and 2.5 m depth. The lysimeter bottom boundary condition resulted in pesticide leaching concentrations lower than those calculated for the field system. Simulations showed that a lysimeter study of 2 yr was too short to measure the maximum leaching concentration for pesticides with organic-matter/ water distribution coefficient values exceeding 40 L kg(-1). The probability that a lysimeter study results in a leaching concentration below 0.1 mu g L-1 by a coincidental favorable combination of pesticide-soil parameters was assessed by Monte Carlo simulations. This probability exceeded 20% for pesticides that would give leaching concentrations of 1 mu g L-1 under field conditions. Therefore, it is advisable that for each lysimeter study, modeling be used to assess the likelihood that the leaching concentration would be below 0.1 mu g L-1, considering all relevant systematic and random factors.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 804
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Zero-Tension Lysimeter for Use in Greywater Irrigation Monitoring
    Mohamed, Radin Maya Saphira Radin
    Kassim, Amir Hashim Mohd
    Anda, Martin
    Dallas, Stewart
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 (02): : 15 - 21
  • [22] AN IMPROVED ZERO-TENSION LYSIMETER TO MONITOR COLLOID TRANSPORT IN SOILS
    THOMPSON, ML
    SCHARF, RL
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1994, 23 (02) : 378 - 383
  • [23] Leaching of Glyphosate and AMPA from Field Lysimeters
    Milan, Marco
    Vidotto, Francesco
    Fogliatto, Silvia
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [24] FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATES UNDER ZERO-TENSION AND TENSION-COMPRESSION LOAD CYCLING
    CROOKER, TW
    REPORT OF NRL PROGRESS, 1970, : 33 - &
  • [25] DIRECT FIELD-MEASUREMENTS OF LEACHING LOSSES OF NITROGEN IN PASTURE AND CROPPING SOILS USING TENSION LYSIMETERS
    GOH, KM
    EDMEADES, DC
    HART, PBS
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1979, 22 (01) : 133 - 142
  • [26] A ZERO-TENSION SAMPLER FOR THE COLLECTION OF SOIL-WATER IN MACROPORE SYSTEMS
    SIMMONS, KE
    BAKER, DE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1993, 22 (01) : 207 - 212
  • [27] LEACHING LOSSES OF NUTRIENTS IN OIL PALM PLANTATIONS DETERMINED BY TENSION LYSIMETERS
    OMOTI, U
    ATAGA, DO
    ISENMILA, AE
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1983, 73 (03) : 365 - 376
  • [28] MONITORING HERBICIDE LEACHING IN SUSTAINABLE VEGETABLE CULTURE USING TENSION LYSIMETERS
    BYERS, ME
    TYESS, D
    ANTONIOUS, GF
    HILBORN, D
    JARRET, L
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 54 (06) : 848 - 854
  • [29] LEACHING OF BENTAZON IN SWEDISH SOILS USING FIELD LYSIMETERS
    BERGSTROM, L
    SWEDISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1992, 22 (03): : 103 - 109
  • [30] COMPARISON OF SOIL SOLUTION CHEMISTRY IN ZERO TENSION AND CERAMIC-CUP TENSION LYSIMETERS
    HENDERSHOT, WH
    COURCHESNE, F
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1991, 42 (04): : 577 - 583