Data-driven acceleration of multiscale methods for uncertainty quantification: application in transient multiphase flow in porous media

被引:2
|
作者
Chan, Shing [1 ]
Elsheikh, Ahmed H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Energy Geosci Infrastruct & Soc, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Machine learning; Multiscale finite element methods; Monte Carlo methods; Approximation methods; Neural networks; FINITE-VOLUME METHOD; ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS; TRANSPORT; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s13137-019-0139-1
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Multiscale methods aim to address the computational cost of elliptic problems on extremely large grids, by using numerically computed basis functions to reduce the dimensionality and complexity of the task. When multiscale methods are applied in uncertainty quantification to solve for a large number of parameter realizations, these basis functions need to be computed repeatedly for each realization. In our recent work (Chan et al. in J Comput Phys 354:493-511, 2017), we introduced a data-driven approach to further accelerate multiscale methods within uncertainty quantification. The basic idea is to construct a surrogate model to generate such basis functions at a much faster speed. The surrogate is modeled using a dataset of computed basis functions collected from a few runs of the multiscale method. Our previous study showed the effectiveness of this framework where speedups of two orders of magnitude were achieved in computing the basis functions while maintaining very good accuracy, however the study was limited to tracer flow/steady state flow problems. In this work, we extend the study to cover transient multiphase flow in porous media and provide further assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Uncertainty quantification in modeling flow and transport in porous media
    Guadagnini, Alberto
    Tartakovsky, Daniel M.
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2010, 24 (07) : 953 - 954
  • [32] Comparison of data-driven uncertainty quantification methods for a carbon dioxide storage benchmark scenario
    Markus Köppel
    Fabian Franzelin
    Ilja Kröker
    Sergey Oladyshkin
    Gabriele Santin
    Dominik Wittwar
    Andrea Barth
    Bernard Haasdonk
    Wolfgang Nowak
    Dirk Pflüger
    Christian Rohde
    Computational Geosciences, 2019, 23 : 339 - 354
  • [33] Comparison of data-driven uncertainty quantification methods for a carbon dioxide storage benchmark scenario
    Koeppel, Markus
    Franzelin, Fabian
    Kroeker, Ilja
    Oladyshkin, Sergey
    Santin, Gabriele
    Wittwar, Dominik
    Barth, Andrea
    Haasdonk, Bernard
    Nowak, Wolfgang
    Pflueger, Dirk
    Rohde, Christian
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 23 (02) : 339 - 354
  • [34] Physics-informed data-driven model for fluid flow in porous media
    Kazemi, Mohammad
    Takbiri-Borujeni, Ali
    Takbiri, Sam
    Kazemi, Arefeh
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2023, 264
  • [35] A data-driven surrogate to image-based flow simulations in porous media
    Takbiri-Borujeni, Ali
    Kazemi, Hadi
    Nasrabadi, Nasser
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2020, 201 (201)
  • [36] Methods for data-driven multiscale model discovery for materials
    Brunton, Steven L.
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-MATERIALS, 2019, 2 (04):
  • [37] Uncertainty quantification techniques for data-driven space weather modeling: thermospheric density application
    Licata, Richard J.
    Mehta, Piyush M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [38] Uncertainty quantification techniques for data-driven space weather modeling: thermospheric density application
    Richard J. Licata
    Piyush M. Mehta
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [39] Uncertainty quantification of fluidized beds using a data-driven framework
    Kotteda, V. M. Krushnarao
    Stephens, J. Adam
    Spotz, William
    Kumar, Vinod
    Kommu, Anitha
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 354 : 709 - 718
  • [40] Data-Driven Model Falsification and Uncertainty Quantification for Fractured Reservoirs
    Junling Fang
    Bin Gong
    Jef Caers
    Engineering, 2022, (11) : 116 - 128