Comparing gradual debonding strategies after prolonged cow-calf contact: Stress responses, performance, and health of dairy cow and calf

被引:30
|
作者
Wenker, Margret L. [1 ,2 ]
Reenen, Cornelis G. van [1 ,2 ]
Bokkers, Eddie A. M. [1 ]
McCrea, Kirste [3 ]
de Oliveira, Daiana [3 ]
Sorheim, Kristin [4 ]
Cao, Yanran [5 ]
Bruckmaier, Rupert M. [6 ]
Gross, Josef J. [6 ]
Gort, Gerrit [7 ]
Verwer, Cynthia M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Anim Prod Syst Grp, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Livestock Res, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, Box 7068, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Norwegian Ctr Organ Agr NORSOK, Gunnars Veg 6, N-6630 Tingvoll, Norway
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biol Sci, Kompasset 271, Alesund, Norway
[6] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Vet Physiol, Bremgartenstr 109a, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[7] Wageningen Univ & Res, Biometris, POB 16, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[8] Louis Bolk Inst, Kosterijland 3-5, NL-3981 AJ Bunnik, Netherlands
关键词
Mother -bonded rearing; Weaning; Separation; Suckling; Sensor data; Animal welfare; BEEF-CALVES; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES; MILK ALLOWANCE; SEPARATION; CATTLE; CORTISOL; FEAR; AGE; HEIFERS; HAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105694
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
We assessed effects of two-step debonding strategies in calf rearing systems with different types of prolonged cow-calf contact (CCC) on stress responses, health and performance of dairy cows and calves. Forty-eight Holstein Friesian cow-calf pairs had either: 1) full contact including suckling, where contact was reduced before weaning via fence-line separation at day 49 (FC-FS) (n = 10); 2) full contact, where contact was reduced at day 56 by fitting calves with a nose-flap (FC-NF) (n = 10); 3) partial contact (calves were housed in a pen adjacent to the cow area allowing physical contact on initiative of the dam but no suckling), where contact was reduced before weaning by moving the calf box from the wall to prevent physical contact at day 49 (PC-BW) (n = 6); 4) partial contact, where contact was reduced the week after weaning by moving the calf box away from the wall at day 63 (PC-AW) (n = 12); 5) no contact (calves were removed from dam directly after birth and housed in a calf barn), calves were weaned at day 56 (NC) (n = 10). Between weeks 7-10, we assessed physiological stress parameters, weight gain, and the health status of calves, plus general activity patterns based on accelerometer sensor data of cow-calf pairs before, during and after the debonding interventions. Additionally, calves were subjected to four consecutive behavioural tests (i.e. open field, novel object, voluntary human approach and involuntary human approach test) prior to permanent separation at day 70 and their behavioural responses were assessed via video recordings to assess fearfulness. Machine-harvested milk yields of cows were evaluated during weeks 6-12. Data were analyzed with (generalized) linear mixed models. Throughout the debonding period, FCNF calves had an impaired growth rate (P = 0.02). In weeks 6-9, FC-FS and FC-NF cows had lower machineharvested milk yields than PC-BW, PC-AW, and NC cows (P <= 0.01). We found no differences in responsiveness of calves to behavioural tests, except that NC calves exhibited more solitary play events compared to PC and FC calves in the novel object test (P = 0.002). Overall, our results imply that calves with partial CCC showed low stress responses to debonding, whereas abrupt weaning with a nose-flap during full contact seemed most stressful. Machine-harvested milk yield of FC cows seemed to recover once calves were weaned. More research into strategies to improve the process of debonding is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Production Responses of an Alternative Beef Cow-calf System
    Carlson, Zachary E.
    McPhillips, Levi J.
    Erickson, Galen E.
    Drewnoski, Mary E.
    MacDonald, James C.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 116 - 116
  • [32] Assessing performance of cow-calf operations using epidemiology
    Rae, DO
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2006, 22 (01) : 53 - +
  • [33] ONCE DAILY SUCKLING EFFECT ON COW-CALF PERFORMANCE
    RANDEL, RD
    WELKER, GA
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1976, 43 (01) : 301 - 301
  • [34] BEEF COW-CALF HERD HEALTH-PROGRAM
    RADOSTITS, OM
    MODERN VETERINARY PRACTICE, 1979, 60 (10): : 786 - 791
  • [35] EFFECT OF HEAVY STOCKING RATES ON COW-CALF PERFORMANCE
    JOHNSON, AB
    HEITSCHMIDT, RK
    FRASURE, JR
    PRICE, DL
    TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION PROGRESS REPORT, 1981, (3758): : 38 - 39
  • [36] The impact of cow size on cow-calf and postweaning progeny performance in the Nebraska Sandhills
    Ziegler, Robert L.
    Musgrave, Jacki A.
    Meyer, Tanya L.
    Funston, Rick N.
    Dennis, Elliott J.
    Hanford, Kathryn J.
    MacDonald, James C.
    Mulliniks, J. Travis
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (04)
  • [37] Effects of sulfates in water on performance of cow-calf pairs
    Patterson, H. H.
    Johnson, P. S.
    Perry, G. A.
    Gates, R. N.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 : 130 - 130
  • [38] Maternal behavior of dairy cows and suckling behavior of dairy calves in different cow-calf contact conditions
    Jensen, Emma Hvidtfeldt
    Neave, Heather W.
    Bateson, Melissa
    Jensen, Margit Bak
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (08) : 6090 - 6103
  • [39] Cow-calf Management Strategies and Their Influence on Environmental Sustainability.
    Lalman, David
    Briggs, Emma A.
    Moore, Mikayla F.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 22 - 22
  • [40] Optimizing pasture management for cow-calf production: Economic responses
    Phillip, LE
    Goldsmith, PD
    Peterson, PR
    Bergeron, M
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 9, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 9 : 135 - 140