Verification of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Success Using Transcranial Doppler in Management of Patients with Postdural Puncture Headache

被引:0
|
作者
Abdelhaleenn, Naglaa Fathy Abdelhaleenn [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Anesthesia & Surg Intens Care Dept, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
关键词
Noninvasive intracranial pressure; postdural puncture headache; sphenopalatine ganglion block; transcranial Doppler; PULSATILITY INDEX; FLOW VELOCITY; SONOGRAPHY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) is traditionally advised in the management of head and neck pain. Since SPGB is a minimally invasive, repeatable, and simple technique, SPGB should be tried first in the management of postdural puncture headaches (PDPH). Verification of the block's success in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic nerve blocks, is of paramount importance in pain management. Objectives: This study intends to prove the ability of SPGB in the management of PDPH. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is utilized as an objective measure to assess the block's success by monitoring variations in the cerebral hemodynamics before and after the block procedure. Noninvasive intracranial pressure (nICP) was applied to support the theory which assumes that the vasodilation of the cerebral blood vessels is the precipitating cause of the PDPH, rather than intracranial hypotension. Study Design: Prospective, triple blinded, controlled, clinical trial. Setting: This clinical trial was conducted at Zagazig University. Methods: In the present study, 123 patients were considered who had spinal and/or epidural anesthesia; 63 patients who developed PDPH joined treatment group A and received the SPGB block. The control group B included 60 patients with no PDPH. The patients in group A were evaluated preprocedure by a numerical pain score and at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postprocedure. Furthermore, patients in both groups were evaluated employing TCD before the transnasal block was given, then it was repeated to group A only within one hour after the block. Results: Results analysis revealed that preprocedural pulsatility index (PI) and mean flow velocity (MFV) values in treatment group A were (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) 0.63 +/- 0.04 and 57.20 +/- 4.85 cm s(-1), respectively. Values of PI and MFV were significantly increased up to (mean +/- SD) 0.87 +/- 0.08 and 71.15 +/- 7.686 cm s(-1), respectively after the block. The computed nICP values preblock and postblock were also within the normal range. Limitations: Performing SPGB without standardized equipment may limit the results of the current study Conclusions: SPGB should be considered as a first treatment modality for PDPH. Moreover, the results indicate that TCD is a successful objective tool in assessing a transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block.
引用
收藏
页码:E661 / E668
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade for the Management of Postdural Puncture Headache After Lumbar Drain Placement in Patients Undergoing Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Hickerson, Leigh C.
    Madden, Anne-Marie
    Keeyapaj, Worasak
    Cheung, Albert T.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (10) : 2736 - 2739
  • [32] Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headaches in a Thrombocytopenic Adolescent Young Adult: A Case Report
    Lo, Carl
    Le, Sang
    Kim, Eugene
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 44 (01) : E299 - E301
  • [33] Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. Reply to Br J Anaesth 2020; 124: 739-47
    Jespersen, M. S.
    Jaeger, P.
    Meyhoff, C. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (04) : E358 - E358
  • [34] Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2020 124: 739-47
    Liu, Christopher W.
    Lim, Huili
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (04) : E359 - E359
  • [35] Sphenopalatine ganglion block by transnasal approach in post-dural puncture headache
    Goncalves, Lucia M.
    Godinho, Pedro M.
    Duran, Francisco J.
    Valente, Elisabete C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2018, 48 : 50 - 50
  • [36] A randomized control study to assess the efficacy of the sphenopalatine ganglion block in patients with post dural puncture headache
    Gayathri, Guruvayurappan Annushha
    Karthik, Kanthan
    Saravanan, Ravi
    Meshach, Mesia D.
    Pushparani, Anand
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 16 (04) : 401 - 405
  • [37] Sphenopalatine ganglion block for treatment of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: An observational study
    Puthenveettil, Nitu
    Rajan, Sunil
    Mohan, Anish
    Paul, Jerry
    Kumar, Lakshmi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (12) : 972 - 977
  • [38] Efficacy and efficiency of sphenopalatine ganglion block for management of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Mowafi, Marwa M.
    Abdelrazik, Rehab A.
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [39] Sphenopalatine ganglion block vs greater occipital nerve block in the management of post dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Abdelrazik, Rehab A.
    Toulan, Heba F.
    Ayoub, Sabah Naguib Barsoom
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 28 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [40] Efficacy and efficiency of sphenopalatine ganglion block for management of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Marwa M. Mowafi
    Rehab A. Abdelrazik
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14