Exploring the use of the medicinal leech: A clinical risk-benefit analysis

被引:103
|
作者
deChalain, TMB [1 ]
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,DEPT PLAST SURG,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1006471
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis, has been used with increasing frequency for salvage of compromised pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfers. The data pertaining to 18 cases in which flap salvage with leeches was attempted were reviewed and contrasted with the data from 108 published cases from other centers. A further analysis isolated and examined 19 cases in which infection, secondary to leech utilization, supervened. Results suggested that successful salvage of tissue with leeches occurs in 70 to 80 percent of cases. In contrast, the infection rate of most series is between 7 and 20 percent and, when a clinically significant infection occurs, the flap salvage rate drops to 30 percent or less. In addition to infection, the risks of leech therapy include blood loss, which may require replacement transfusion, loss of leeches into body orifices and spaces, allergic reactions, and adverse psychological responses. Clinical indications and contraindications, and strategies to reduce the risks of leech usage, are discussed. Conclusions are that leeches are best used early, and in accordance with an accepted institutional protocol. For each case, the potential risks and benefits must be rigorously assessed and honestly applied.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applying a Risk-benefit Analysis to Outcomes in Tuberculosis Clinical Trials
    Miyahara, Sachiko
    Ramchandani, Ritesh
    Kim, Soyeon
    Evans, Scott R.
    Gupta, Amita
    Swindells, Susan
    Chaisson, Richard E.
    Montepiedra, Grace
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 70 (04) : 698 - 703
  • [22] RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND THE DETERMINATION OF ACCEPTABLE RISK
    DARDIS, R
    DAVENPORT, G
    KURIN, J
    MARR, J
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 1983, 17 (01) : 38 - 56
  • [23] RISK-BENEFIT
    MCCLUNG, N
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND CHILDHOOD SCHIZOPHRENIA, 1978, 8 (01): : 107 - 108
  • [24] RISK-BENEFIT
    MARTIN, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 174 (07) : 691 - 691
  • [25] Prostate Biopsy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03): : 852 - 853
  • [26] Best Practices in Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Verhagen, H.
    Tijhuis, M.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Leino, O.
    Lutejin, J.
    Magnusson, S.
    Odekerken, G.
    Pohjola, M.
    Tuomisto, J.
    Ueland, O.
    White, B.
    Holm, F.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2011, 58 : 415 - 415
  • [27] NEW ANTIMALARIALS - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    NOSTEN, F
    PRICE, RN
    DRUG SAFETY, 1995, 12 (04) : 264 - 273
  • [28] Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery
    Ludwig, Kaja
    Schneider-Koriath, Sylke
    Bernhardt, Joern
    Huettl, Thomas P.
    VISZERALMEDIZIN, 2010, 26 (01): : 21 - 25
  • [29] Losing the balance in risk-benefit analysis
    Rehani, Madan M.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (02)
  • [30] THE ILEOANAL POUCH - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    KOHLER, L
    TROIDL, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (04) : 443 - 447