共 50 条
Evaluation of the screening power of Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument for probable Alzheimer's disease using voxel-based morphometry
被引:3
|作者:
Mok, Greta S. P.
[3
]
Wu, Yi-Ying
[4
]
Lu, Kun-Mu
[5
]
Wu, Jay
[1
,2
]
Chen, Liang-Kuang
[5
,6
]
Wu, Tung-Hsin
[1
]
机构:
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Biomed Imaging & Radiol Sci, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Cent Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Radiol Sci, Taichung 40601, Taiwan
[3] Univ Macau, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Fac Sci & Technol, Taipa, Peoples R China
[4] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Shin Kong Wu Ho Su Mem Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词:
Alzheimer's disease;
Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument;
Voxel-based morphometry;
MINI-MENTAL STATE;
GRAY-MATTER LOSS;
DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE;
EARLY-ONSET;
DEMENTIA;
PREVALENCE;
POPULATION;
SUBTYPES;
ATROPHY;
MRI;
D O I:
10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.03.004
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare two screening methods, total score of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI(T)) and the combined score for the short-term memory and orientation domains (CASI(R)) for screening and grading probable Alzheimer's disease (AD), based on their correlations with voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Materials and methods: Forty-five subjects with probable AD and normal controls underwent magnetic resonance imaging and CASI testing. Their corresponding T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were analyzed using VBM. Results: VBM results showed that in moderate-to-severe AD subgroups, significant whole-brain gray matter loss was detected using both CASIT and CASI(R). Significantly more voxels were detected using the CASI(T) compared with the CASI(R) system in mild AD subjects (P<.05). Conclusions: Based on their correlations with VBM results, there is no significant difference for CASI(R) and CASI(T) for grading moderate-to-severe AD subgroups, and CASI(R) scoring system may be more accurate and effective than the CASI(T) for screening mild AD. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文