The use of the Minnaert correction for land-cover classification in mountainous terrain

被引:51
|
作者
Blesius, L
Weirich, F
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, IIHR Hydrosci & Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Geosci, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01431160500104194
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Land-cover classifications in mountainous terrain are often hampered by the topographic effect. Several strategies can be pursued to correct for this. A traditional approach is to use training areas for the same land-cover class for different topographic positions and later merge those into one class. Other solutions involve topographic corrections, such as a Minnaert correction. In this study the classification result of the traditional training-area approach was compared with the classification result of a Minnaert-corrected image. In order to derive the Minnaert constants, a SPOT XS scene of the Santa Monica Mountains, USA, was divided into three visually relatively homogeneous regions. Eighty per cent of the pixels were assigned the same land cover in both classifications. Differences in classification were mainly in the section of the image that had more diverse land cover than in the more homogeneous chaparral-covered eastern section. This supports previous findings that the Minnaert constant needs to be derived for individual land-cover classes. The findings also suggest that after the Minnaert correction the resulting classification is comparable to the classification obtained using a more traditional approach.
引用
收藏
页码:3831 / 3851
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-temporal polarimetry in land-cover classification
    Wozniak, Edyta
    Kofman, Wlodek
    Lewinski, Stanislaw
    Wajer, Pawel
    Rybicki, Marcin
    Aleksandrowicz, Sebastian
    Wlodarkiewicz, Adam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 39 (22) : 8182 - 8199
  • [32] A GRAPHICAL APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION PROCEDURES
    GONG, P
    HOWARTH, PJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 11 (05) : 899 - 905
  • [33] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING
    CIVCO, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1993, 7 (02): : 173 - 186
  • [34] Impact of topographic normalization on land-cover classification accuracy
    Hale, SR
    Rock, BN
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 69 (07): : 785 - 791
  • [35] AFRICAN LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION USING SATELLITE DATA
    TUCKER, CJ
    TOWNSHEND, JRG
    GOFF, TE
    SCIENCE, 1985, 227 (4685) : 369 - 375
  • [36] Unsupervised land-cover classification of interferometric SAR images
    Dammert, PBG
    Kuhlmann, S
    Askne, J
    IGARSS '98 - 1998 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1-5: SENSING AND MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT, 1998, : 1805 - 1808
  • [37] A Land-Cover Classification Method Using Point of Interest
    Xing H.
    Meng Y.
    Hou D.
    Xu H.
    Liu J.
    Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019, 44 (05): : 758 - 764
  • [38] A validated ensemble method for multinomial land-cover classification
    Diengdoh, Vishesh L.
    Ondei, Stefania
    Hunt, Mark
    Brook, Barry W.
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 56
  • [39] Fuzzy Image Segmentation for Urban Land-Cover Classification
    Lizarazo, Ivan
    Barros, Joana
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 76 (02): : 151 - 162
  • [40] Unsupervised Land-Cover Classification Using a Cluster Algorithm
    Cipar, John
    Lockwood, Ronald
    Cooley, Thomas
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-8, 2006, : 4201 - 4204