Modelling return-to-work intervention strategies: A method to help target interventions

被引:5
|
作者
Joling, C [1 ]
Janssen, PPM [1 ]
Groot, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Org Policy & Econ, Netherlands Sch Primary Care Res,Caphri, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
intervention strategy; endogeneity bias; selection bias; simultaneous modelling;
D O I
10.1023/B:JOOR.0000015010.38570.11
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is twofold: 1) to investigate the relationship between the probability of receiving an intervention by the occupational physician and the probability of return-to-work (RTW) of sick workers; 2) to explore the use of simultaneous modelling of the intervention and RTW process. Analyses are performed on population level using data from a major longitudinal survey on work incapacity and RTW in the Netherlands. A bivariate probit model is used to estimate the correlation between the probability of intervention and the probability of RTW. A bivariate hazard model is applied to explore the joint distribution of the waiting times for the intervention and RTW. The results of this study show that the probability of receiving an intervention from the occupational physician is not correlated with the probability of RTW. Neither is the timing of both events correlated. The analyses do not indicate that the intervention by the occupational physician provides incentives for sick workers to RTW quicker.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 62
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature
    Franche, RL
    Cullen, K
    Clarke, J
    Irvin, E
    Sinclair, S
    Frank, J
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 15 (04) : 607 - 631
  • [32] Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: A systematic review
    Donker-Cools, Birgit H. P. M.
    Daams, Joost G.
    Wind, Haije
    Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (02) : 113 - 131
  • [33] Return-to-work interventions for sick-listed employees with burnout: a systematic review
    Lambreghts, Charlotte
    Vandenbroeck, Sofie
    Goorts, Kaat
    Godderis, Lode
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 80 (09) : 538 - 544
  • [34] Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literature
    Renée-Louise Franche
    Kimberley Cullen
    Judy Clarke
    Emma Irvin
    Sandra Sinclair
    John Frank
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2005, 15 : 607 - 631
  • [35] Evaluation of return-to-work interventions for sickness absentees: alternatives to randomized controlled studies
    de Rijk, Angelique
    Alexanderson, Kristina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 16 : 57 - 57
  • [36] How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability?
    Briand, Catherine
    Durand, Marie-Jose
    St-Arnaud, Louise
    Corbiere, Marc
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (02) : 207 - 217
  • [37] Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: A systematic review
    Donker-Cools, Birgit
    Daams, Joost
    Wind, Haije
    Frings-Dresen, Monique
    BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (5-6) : 705 - 706
  • [38] How Well Do Return-to-work Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions Address the Multicausality of Work Disability?
    Catherine Briand
    Marie-José Durand
    Louise St-Arnaud
    Marc Corbière
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2008, 18 : 207 - 217
  • [39] Work it Out: Development of a Self-Led Return-to-Work Intervention Tool Using a Delphi Consensus-Building Method
    Wallis, Deborah J.
    Munir, Fehmidah
    Kalawsky, Katryna
    Donaldson-Feilder, Emma
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 292 - 293
  • [40] Implementation of a Coordinated and Tailored Return-to-Work Intervention for Employees with Mental Health Problems
    Martin, Marie H. T.
    Nielsen, Maj Britt D.
    Petersen, Signe M. A.
    Jakobsen, Louise M.
    Rugulies, Reiner
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 22 (03) : 427 - 436