Body size, biomic specialization and range size of African large mammals

被引:52
|
作者
Fernández, MH
Vrba, ES
机构
[1] CSIC, Museo Nacl Ciencias Nat, Dept Paleobiol, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Geol, Dept Palaeontol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, Kline Geol Lab, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Africa; bioclimatology; biogeography; biome; comparative analysis; ecological pattern; ecological specialization; macroecology; Mammalia;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01270.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim The goal of this paper is to examine the relationships between body size, biomic specialization and range size in the African large mammals, which are defined as all the African species corresponding to the orders Primates, Carnivora, Proboscidea, Perissodactyla, Hyracoidea, Tubulidentata, Artiodactyla and Pholidota. Location The study used the large mammal assemblage from Africa. Methods The degree of biomic specialization of African large mammals is investigated using the biomic specialization index (BSI) for each mammal species, based on the number of biomes it inhabits. Range size for each species is measured as the latitudinal extent of the geographical distribution of the species. We have analysed our data using both conventional cross-species analyses and phylogenetically independent contrasts. Results There is a polygonal relationship between species biomic specialization and body size. While small and large species are biomic specialists, medium-sized species are distributed along the whole range of biomic specialization. The latitudinal extent-body size relationship is approximately triangular. Small-bodied species may have either large or small ranges, whereas large-bodied ones have only large ranges. A positive correlation between latitudinal extent and biomic specialization is evident, although their relationship is better described as triangular. Main conclusions We found a polygonal relationship between species biomic specialization and body size, which agrees with previous arguments that small-bodied species have more limited dispersal and, therefore, they may come to occupy a lesser proportion of their potential inhabitable biomes. On the other hand, large-bodied species are constrained to inhabit biomes with a high productivity. A polygonal relationship between species latitudinal extent and body size in African large mammals agrees with previous studies of the relationship between range size and body size in other continents. The independent study of the macroecological pattern in biomic specialization highlights different factors that influence the body size-range size relationship. Although body size is usually implicated as a correlate of both specialization and geographical range size in large mammals, much of the variation in these variables cannot be attributed to size differences but to biome specific factors such as productivity, area, history, etc.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimation of Body-Size Traits by Photogrammetry in Large Mammals to Inform Conservation
    Berger, Joel
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (05) : 769 - 777
  • [22] Scaling of number, size, and metabolic rate of cells with body size in mammals
    Savage, Van M.
    Allen, Andrew P.
    Brown, James H.
    Gillooly, James F.
    Herman, Alexander B.
    Woodruff, William H.
    West, Geoffrey B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (11) : 4718 - 4723
  • [23] Population size and conservation status of large terrestrial mammals in a West African protected area
    Mohammed, Umar Lawal
    Sah, Shahrul Anuar Mohd
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2024, 62 (01)
  • [24] A genetic program limiting body size in mammals
    Lui, Julian
    Forcinito, Patricia
    Chang, Maria
    Chen, Weiping
    Barnes, Kevin M.
    Baron, Jeffrey
    HORMONE RESEARCH, 2009, 72 : 25 - 25
  • [25] SEASONALITY, FASTING ENDURANCE, AND BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS
    LINDSTEDT, SL
    BOYCE, MS
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1985, 125 (06): : 873 - 878
  • [26] Brain size scaling and body composition in mammals
    Schoenemann, PT
    BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND EVOLUTION, 2004, 63 (01) : 47 - 60
  • [27] The Evolution of Maximum Body Size of Terrestrial Mammals
    Smith, Felisa A.
    Boyer, Alison G.
    Brown, James H.
    Costa, Daniel P.
    Dayan, Tamar
    Ernest, S. K. Morgan
    Evans, Alistair R.
    Fortelius, Mikael
    Gittleman, John L.
    Hamilton, Marcus J.
    Harding, Larisa E.
    Lintulaakso, Kari
    Lyons, S. Kathleen
    McCain, Christy
    Okie, Jordan G.
    Saarinen, Juha J.
    Sibly, Richard M.
    Stephens, Patrick R.
    Theodor, Jessica
    Uhen, Mark D.
    SCIENCE, 2010, 330 (6008) : 1216 - 1219
  • [28] ON PROBLEM OF CHANGE OF BODY SIZE IN QUATERNARY MAMMALS
    PEI, WC
    SCIENTIA SINICA, 1963, 12 (02): : 231 - &
  • [29] ON THE PROBLEM OF THE CHANGE OF BODY SIZE IN QUATERNARY MAMMALS
    裴文中
    Science China Mathematics, 1963, (02) : 231 - 235
  • [30] EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY OF CHANGES IN BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS
    PANTELEEV, PA
    SOVIET JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1981, 12 (06) : 315 - 322