Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension: pilot study of 35 cases of severe pelvic organ prolapse

被引:22
|
作者
Lu, Zhiying [1 ]
Chen, Yisong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaojuan [1 ]
Li, Junwei [1 ]
Hua, Keqin [1 ]
Hu, Changdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Dept Gynecol, 128 Shenyang RD, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
关键词
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral ligament suspension; URINARY RETENTION; VAULT SUSPENSION; INCONTINENCE; WOMEN; RISK; MESH;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-021-01280-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To describe the short-term outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) in patients with severe prolapse. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with severe prolapse (>= stage 3) who underwent vNOTES for USLS between May 2019 and July 2020. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) score, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12) and Pelvic Floor Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) were used to evaluate physical prolapse and quality of life before and after vNOTES for USLS. Results A total of 35 patients were included. The mean operative duration was 111.7 +/- 39.4 min. The mean blood loss was 67.9 +/- 35.8 ml. Statistically significant differences were observed between before and after vNOTES USLS in Aa (+ 0.6 +/- 1.7 versus - 2.9 +/- 0.2), Ba (+ 1.9 +/- 2.2 versus - 2.9 +/- 0.3), C (+ 1.5 +/- 2.2 versus - 6.9 +/- 0.9), Ap (- 1.4 +/- 1.0 versus - 3.0 +/- 0.1) and Bp (- 1.1 +/- 1.4 versus - 2.9 +/- 0.1) (P < 0.05 for all). The mean pre- and postoperative PFDI-20 score was 19.9 +/- 6.7 and 3.2 +/- 5.4, respectively, and the mean pre- and postoperative PISQ-12 score was 24.8 +/- 2.3 and 38.3 +/- 4.1, respectively (P < 0.05 for both). During 1-13 months of follow-up, there were no cases of severe complications or recurrence. Conclusions vNOTES for USLS may be a feasible technique to manage severe prolapse, with promising short-term efficacy and safety. Larger studies with more patients and longer follow-up periods should be performed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety profile of vNOTES for USLS.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A preliminary clinical report of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the treatment of moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse
    Qin, Zhenyue
    Dong, Zhiyong
    Tang, Huimin
    Zhang, Shoufeng
    Wang, Huihui
    Bao, Mingyue
    Wei, Weiwei
    Shi, Ruxia
    Chen, Jiming
    Xia, Bairong
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [12] Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Sacrocolpopexy: A Pilot Study of 26 Cases
    Liu, Juan
    Kohn, Jaden
    Fu, Huaying
    Guan, Zhenkun
    Guan, Xiaoming
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 748 - 753
  • [13] Intraoperative Fluorescent Ureter Visualization for Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Barba, Marta
    Cola, Alice
    Frigerio, Matteo
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (07) : 1549 - 1551
  • [14] Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse
    Ekin, Murat
    Dura, Mustafa Cengiz
    Yildiz, Sukru
    Guersoy, Berk
    Yildiz, Yagmur Yucebas
    Dogan, Keziban
    Kaya, Cihan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [15] Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Novara, Lorenzo
    Sgro, Luca Giuseppe
    Pecchio, Silvia
    Ottino, Laura
    Tomatis, Veronica
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 278 - 281
  • [16] Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Sec Shull by Vaginal Natural Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES)
    Scollo, Paolo
    Pecorino, Basilio
    Ferrara, Martina
    Mereu, Liliana
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2022, 44 (06) : 703 - 703
  • [17] Robot-assisted Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Management of Endometriosis: A Pilot Study of 33 Cases
    Zhang, Yiming
    Delgado, Stephanie
    Liu, Juan
    Guan, Zhenkun
    Guan, Xiaoming
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 2060 - 2066
  • [18] Comparative analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A propensity score matching study
    Chen, Yan
    Zhou, Youjun
    Tan, Liping
    Chen, Shihui
    Wu, Chunhua
    Liang, Yanling
    Sun, Nannan
    Liu, Juan
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [19] Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy
    Ozceltik, Gokay
    Simsek, Deniz
    Hortu, Ismet
    Yeniel, Ahmet O.
    Itil, Ismail M.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (03) : 843 - 849
  • [20] Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in the morbidly obese
    Panait, Lucian
    Wood, Stephanie G.
    Bell, Robert L.
    Duffy, Andrew J.
    Roberts, Kurt E.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (07): : 2625 - 2629