Minority Shareholder Protection in Corporations: Protection for Whom, Why, and How?

被引:1
|
作者
Kayiklik, Abdurrahman [1 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Hukuk Fak, Ticaret Hukuku Anabilim Dali, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
ISTANBUL HUKUK MECMUASI | 2022年 / 80卷 / 02期
关键词
The Turkish Commercial Code; Joint Stock Corporations; Minority Shareholders; Protection of Minority Shareholders; Minority Shareholder Rights; Mandatory Norms; Voice; Exit Rights;
D O I
10.26650/mecmua.2022.80.2.0003
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Protection of minority shareholders is one of the key concerns of corporate law. This paper examines how the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) protects minority shareholders while paying special attention to close joint stock corporations with a controlling shareholder. First, it assesses how the concept of minority in corporations has been used in the TCC and existing literature and then attempts to define it. Second, it explains the legal and financial risks that necessitate minority protection using examples. Third, it explores why minority shareholders are usually unable to protect themselves from such risks and offers justifications for protection through mandatory norms. Finally, the paper analyzes the system of the TCC for minority protection by subjecting the protective mechanisms to a taxonomy. After taking a critical approach toward the so-called positive-negative minority rights dichotomy used by most Turkish scholars for its limited scope and the criterion for such dichotomy, the paper offers a novel taxonomy. The functional approach that this paper presents classifies the statutory mechanisms into five categories. The first category, voice, consists of rights allowing minority shareholders to influence corporate decisions and transactions. The second category, exit rights, enables minority shareholders to exit the corporation through a free or safe exit. The third category, foundational rights, ensures proper exercise of voice and exit rights. The fourth category, gap-filling principles, includes abstract norms that supplement the concrete rules in the previous categories. The fifth and final category, the protective walls, is part of the legal mechanisms that aim at protecting the very system that protects minority shareholders.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 453
页数:47
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Has the EU Takeover Directive Improved Minority Shareholder Protection? The Spanish Evidence
    Nuria Alcalde
    Inés Pérez-Soba
    European Business Organization Law Review, 2016, 17 : 261 - 283
  • [22] How relevant is dividend policy under low shareholder protection?
    Renneboog, Luc
    Szilagyi, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2020, 64
  • [23] Collecting data to improve LGBTI minority health: why, how, with whom?
    Grenouilleau-Albertini, Anne-Sophie
    Liot, Pierre
    Sachs, Ariane
    Suarez, Thomas
    Saout, Christian
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2022, 34 (02): : 81 - 89
  • [24] Shareholder protection: a leximetric approach
    Lele, Priya P.
    Siems, Mathias M.
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT: REFORM, FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORKS, 2009, : 143 - 175
  • [25] SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION: A LEXIMETRIC APPROACH
    Lele, Priya P.
    Siems, Mathias M.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW STUDIES, 2007, 7 (01) : 17 - 50
  • [26] Share issues and shareholder protection
    Delport, P. A.
    DE JURE, 2013, 46 (04) : 1056 - 1065
  • [27] Shareholder Protection and the Cost of Capital
    Houston, Joel F.
    Lin, Chen
    Xie, Wensi
    JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2018, 61 (04): : 677 - 710
  • [28] Creditor protection, shareholder protection and investment efficiency: New evidence
    Quoc Trung Tran
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52
  • [29] ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION FOR WHOM
    SHAPIRO, SP
    SOCIAL POLICY, 1979, 10 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [30] THE FEDERAL PROTECTION OF FOREIGN CORPORATIONS
    Isaacs, Elcanon
    COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1926, 26 (03) : 263 - 292