Laryngeal effects of nasal allergen provocation in singers with allergic rhinitis

被引:11
|
作者
Verguts, Monique M. L. [1 ]
Eggermont, Anita [2 ]
Decoster, Wivine [2 ]
de Jong, Felix I. C. R. S. [1 ,2 ]
Hellings, Peter W. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Div Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Lab Expt Otorhinolaryngol, Ctr Excellence Voice, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Expt Immunol Lab, Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Allergy; Allergic rhinitis; Allergic laryngitis; Nasal provocation; Voice disorders; Hoarseness; Globus; DERMATOPHAGOIDES-PTERONYSSINUS; ANTIGEN STIMULATION; VOICE; ASTHMA; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-010-1420-y
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
In spite of our recent insight into nasobronchial interaction mechanisms in allergic airway disease, the association between allergic rhinitis and voice complaints remains obscure. To evaluate the effects of nasal allergen provocation and seasonal grass pollen exposure on subjective and objective laryngeal parameters in singers with and without allergic rhinitis, an observational case control study was conducted. Prior to the pollen season, six grass pollen allergic and six non-allergic semiprofessional singers were exposed to nebulized sham solution and grass pollen extract (HALA degrees) in rising concentrations. After 3 min, 60 min and 24 h, nasal and laryngeal complaints were evaluated by the use of a visual analog scale (VAS). Laryngeal parameters like voice appearance (video stroboscopic images), voice range profile and subjective (GRBAS) and objective (jitter, shimmer, H/N, DSI) voice quality were evaluated before provocation, after 60 min and 24 h. During the pollen season, the allergic singers were re-evaluated. Results showed that in allergic singers both nasal (TNS of 4.0 +/- A 2.4 vs. 0.0 +/- A 0.0, p < 0.05) and laryngeal complaints (TLS of 1.4 +/- A 1.1 vs. 0.0 +/- A 0.2, p < 0.05) were induced at 3 min after the provocation. The induced laryngeal complaints were the feeling of laryngeal irritation, secretions and globus. No change in voice quality or stroboscopy score was measured. During the pollen season, laryngeal complaints were present (TLS of 2.4 +/- A 2.4) in allergic singers, without evidence for objective voice and laryngeal changes. In conclusion, we here demonstrate the rapid induction of laryngeal complaints in allergic singers by nasal allergen provocation and during the pollen season. There was no subject reported or investigator measured change in voice quality. No change in stroboscopy score was measured.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 427
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis
    Kim, Young Hyo
    Yang, Tae Yong
    Lee, Dong Youl
    Ko, Kook Jin
    Shin, Seung Ho
    Jang, Tae Young
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 139 (01) : 120 - 123
  • [32] The use of nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of perennial allergic rhinitis
    Litvyakova, L
    Bellanti, JA
    Lugovtsova, GA
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (02) : S266 - S266
  • [33] Acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation test in perennial allergic rhinitis
    Keck, Tilman
    Wiesmiller, Kerstin
    Lindemann, Joerg
    Rozsasi, Ajnacska
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 263 (10) : 910 - 916
  • [34] Nasal provocation test is useful for discriminating allergic, nonallergic, and local allergic rhinitis
    Jang, Tae Young
    Kim, Young Hyo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2015, 29 (04) : E100 - E104
  • [35] Nasal conditioning in perennial allergic rhinitis after nasal allergen challenge
    Rozsasi, A
    Leiacker, R
    Keck, T
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2004, 34 (07): : 1099 - 1104
  • [36] The effects of the nasal antihistamines olopatadine and azelastine in nasal allergen provocation
    Pipkorn, Patrik
    Costantini, Candy
    Reynolds, Curt
    Wall, Michael
    Drake, Margaret
    Sanico, Alvin
    Proud, David
    Togias, Alkis
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 101 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [37] Nasal provocation test is useful for the diagnoses of allergic, non-allergic, and local allergic rhinitis
    Kim, Y. H.
    Jang, T. Y.
    ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 70 - 70
  • [38] The influence of European legislation on the use of diagnostic test allergens for nasal allergen provocation in routine care of patients with allergic rhinitis
    Klimek, L.
    Hammerbacher, A. S.
    Hellings, P. W.
    Fokkens, W. J.
    Hoffmann, H. J.
    Muraro, A.
    Papadopoulos, N.
    RHINOLOGY, 2015, 53 (03) : 260 - 269
  • [39] The role of nasal provocation test in the differential diagnosis of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis
    Ersoy, Ramazan
    Unsel, Mehmet
    Ardeniz, F. Omur
    Gulbahar, Okan
    Mete, Nihal
    Sin, Aytul Z.
    Kokuludag, Ali
    ASTIM ALLERJI IMMUNOLOJI, 2012, 10 (03): : 143 - 148
  • [40] CYTOKINE DETECTION IN NASAL LAVAGE FLUID IN PATIENTS WITH ALLERGIC RHINITIS AFTER NASAL PROVOCATION
    FRIERI, M
    KARNIK, A
    KNAPIK, M
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 91 (01) : 182 - 182