Digital subtraction in gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the brain: a method to reduce contrast dosage

被引:2
|
作者
Chan, JHM
Tsui, EYK
Chan, CY
Lai, KF
Chau, LF
Fong, D
Mok, CK
Cheung, YK
Wong, KPC
Yuen, MK
机构
[1] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] No Dist Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Med, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
digital subtraction; dose reduction; contrast-enhanced MRI; brain tumour; MR imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-001-1285-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of using digital subtraction in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the brain to reduce the MR contrast dosage without jeopardizing patient care. Fifty-two patients with intracranial lesions, either intra-axial or extra-axial, detected by computerized tomography were selected for contrast-enhanced MR imaging with half-dose and full-dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The half-dose unsubtracted, full-dose unsubtracted, and half-dose subtracted MR images were visually assessed by counting the number of enhancing brain lesions in the images and quantitatively analyzed by computing their lesion contrast-to-background ratios (CBR). The visual conspicuity of the half-dose subtracted MR images was comparable to that of the full-dose unsubtracted MR images (p>0.05), whereas the CBR of the half-dose subtracted images was approximately two to three times higher than that of the full-dose unsubtracted images. The half-dose subtracted T1-weighted spin-echo images might be able to replace the conventional standard-dose T1-weighted spin-echo images in MR imaging of the brain.
引用
收藏
页码:2317 / 2321
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Which Study When? Iodinated Contrast-Enhanced CT Versus Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Imaging Editorial Comment - Which Study When? Is Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Imaging Safer Than Iodine-Enhanced CT? Editorial Comment
    Halvorsen, R. A.
    Weinreb, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1749 - 1750
  • [42] Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging
    Ohtani, T
    Kurihara, H
    Ishiuchi, S
    Saito, N
    Oriuchi, N
    Inoue, T
    Sasaki, T
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (11) : 1664 - 1670
  • [43] GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR IMAGING IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF LYMPHOMATOUS MASSES
    RAHMOUNI, A
    CYRILLE, S
    DIVINE, M
    MATHIEU, D
    HAIOUN, C
    VASILE, N
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 118 - 118
  • [44] Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in bone marrow disorders - Response
    Ledermann, HP
    Morrison, WB
    Schweitzer, ME
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (01) : 305 - 305
  • [45] Usefulness of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of the vascularity of scaphoid nonunions
    Cerezal, L
    Abascal, F
    Canga, A
    García-Valtuille, R
    Bustamante, M
    del Piñal, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [46] Cirrhosis: spectrum of findings on unenhanced and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging
    Vitellas, KM
    Tzalonikou, MT
    Bennett, WF
    Vaswani, KK
    Bova, JG
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2001, 26 (06): : 601 - 615
  • [47] INFLAMMATORY JOINT DISEASE - STATIC AND DYNAMIC GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    REISER, MF
    NAEGELE, M
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 307 - 310
  • [48] Noninvasive measurement of renal hemodynamic functions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging
    Katzberg, RW
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (01) : 287 - 288
  • [49] Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: Prognostic value of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging
    LeHir, P
    Laredo, J
    Rull, C
    Tubiana, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 224 - 224
  • [50] PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE WITH GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED DYNAMIC MR IMAGING FOR UTERINE NEOPLASMS
    HIRANO, Y
    KUBO, K
    HIRAI, Y
    OKADA, S
    YAMADA, K
    SAWANO, S
    YAMASHITA, T
    HIRAMATSU, Y
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1992, 12 (02) : 243 - 256